English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

NO!!!!!!!! I think that the lack of management, poor writers with little or no imagination,combined with the fact that MOST of the scripts are recycled,. Is the reason for the slow fall of Vinnie's enterprise

2007-03-12 00:13:55 · answer #1 · answered by under his feathers 6 · 1 0

Yes.

The loss of Stone Cold & Rock as well is one of the many things that kinda turned some fans off WWE. They don't like the replacements (guys like Cena) and have either quit watching or watch TNA as an alternative these days.

When Austin was on top it was fresh and you didn't want to miss a single Monday Night Raw. With Cena on top it's stale and you could miss several months and wouldn't miss anything.

2007-03-12 06:41:57 · answer #2 · answered by startgame29 3 · 0 0

YES!!! Stone Cold was the best thing to happen to wrestling, period. It was a shame about his injury. But did you see what happened last week?! Stone Cold is going to be the special guest referee in the match between Donald Trump and Vince McMahon's hair!!!
There was a lot of buildup and hype around the announcement including a "could've been the special guest ref" appearance by none other than Mick Foley. Once I heard the glass break, I couldn't help but get up and jump around, sticking my middle fingers in the air! Anyway, I for one am happy to see him back. WHAT!!!!

2007-03-11 23:59:56 · answer #3 · answered by atamayojr 1 · 0 0

Stone Cold put the entertainment in world wrestling entertainment

2007-03-12 00:04:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Nope, the reason it's less entertaining to watch is cause it's the same ole stuff over and over with most of the storyline, Cena this, Batista that, and if it's not one of those two, then someone annoying like King Booker or Edge has the belts, it's so annoying.

2007-03-12 00:16:05 · answer #5 · answered by revman_237 4 · 0 0

It is gonna be entertaining again because Stone Cold is going to be the special guest referee for the Lashley vs Umaga match.

2007-03-11 23:52:41 · answer #6 · answered by WWE Champ 5 · 0 0

for sure!

the attitude era was the greatest era ever for the wwe and now since characters like austin and rock are gone it makes it not as entertaining and they are trying to replace austin with a rebel like John Cena, you cant replace Austin... no matter how many people are in your chaingang!

2007-03-11 23:52:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

HELL NO! the creatives at wwe ran out of ideas... most of the gimmicks they're writing are rehashed from the past... the fans/viewers know these too well and so makes everyone bored...

2007-03-12 02:13:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i think after the yr 2000 wwe was just less entertaining altogether

2007-03-11 23:51:16 · answer #9 · answered by JennyBoomBoom 1 · 0 0

it was boring before it was boring during and it was boring after they need to find people like iron sheik hulk hogan Andre the giant hacksaw Jim dugan that was entertainment

2007-03-11 23:58:22 · answer #10 · answered by brighterthanyou 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers