I always wonder if they will ever be able to win without working to capture local support. I believe instead of destroying and fighting with fire, they should approach on foot and focus on re-building, to win over local support. This was evident in the strategies used by Britain and Australia. Jim Richards(on) a british NATO commander worked on rebuilding, however the americans were angry with him and forced him to hand over the town he controlled. He had brokered a ceasefire with the Taliban for 4 months. on the first day under American command, the Americans kicked down local gates and doors in the search for Taliban, upsetting locals, bringing the Taliban back into action, with a full-on firefight. and the town was lost to the taliban by the end of the day. comment.
2007-03-11 23:15:03 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
comment in detail and justify your answer.
2007-03-13 01:28:32 · update #1
No...there is no mushroom cloud over the country....
2007-03-11 23:22:36 · answer #1 · answered by Real Estate Para Legal 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
A definitive , resounding NO. The reasons are crystal clear to anyone even remotely familiar with the situation.
2007-03-12 02:26:27 · answer #2 · answered by emiliosailez 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bad strategy
2007-03-11 23:45:22 · answer #3 · answered by Tropango 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course the brave army that freed the whole world from dignity, wealth, oil, respect and mercy is doing well. Abughurib and Guantanamo are clear evidence. Thanks America .
2007-03-11 23:48:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The UN is in command of Afgahnistan.
2007-03-11 23:56:04 · answer #5 · answered by THOR! 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sooner or later the Americans will advance to the rear and go home.
2007-03-11 23:23:00 · answer #6 · answered by The Bird 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
i say bomb it with alotta missles or nuke the damn country take out bin laden and maybe a few a; queda terrorists
2007-03-12 00:24:16 · answer #7 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋