English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do the former communist terrorists really believe that planting bombs at civilian bus and train stations killing woman and children constitutes an "armed struggle"?
I was in Bloemfontein in December for a week and visited the local war museum, I was disgusted by the "Armed Struggle" display!
I think what I really find pathetic is the fact these idiots are convincing themselves they fought a war against the South African Defense Force of yesterday and won.
Thoughts please??

2007-03-11 22:26:21 · 13 answers · asked by Raging Bull II 2 in Travel Africa & Middle East South Africa

Tumi - Why do you continue to make ridiculous statements like this?
Maybe if Africans were capable of invention they would have had weapons, did that ever cross your mind? What were Africans doing while Europeans were inventing and perfecting literature, art, circumnavigation, automobiles, flight, weapons etc.......oh yes they were building mud huts.......

2007-03-12 01:15:15 · update #1

Wanda - While I disagree with your viewpoints and always will, I will admit that you at least made some sense this time around. Well done.

2007-03-12 03:19:52 · update #2

13 answers

tumi please wake up and smell the coffee. so now you want to tell me that only they suffered? their women and children were the only victims!

its funny that with the change of government our history was just erased just like that. Did you forgot what happened in the Boer war did you forget that we were put in concentration camps our woman and children were suffering our farms were burned to the ground!

o but we are privilege we are not allowed to have suffered, we are not allowed to have a history!

2007-03-12 01:50:07 · answer #1 · answered by sweet - angel 3 · 4 0

Did they have details of the atrocities the ANC committed in Quattro Camp in Angola and other camps in Tanzania and Zambia.on their own people? Did they have the "necklace" as authorised by Mandela and implemented by that scum he called his wife?
Reagan and Thatcher were right about the ANC - a bunch of cowardly terrorists who didnt have the guts to confront the SADF. Attacking innocent civilians was and is the only thing they were ever any good at or sitting overseas mooching off European Governments e.g Mbeki or that other Communist clown and his wife Tambo. The real problem of course is that they will teach the children that drivel in your schools and so many South Africans will grow up with a distorted view of history unless you tell them the truth.

Wanda - That is the kind of half truths and tripe that I guess you feed to the gullible Tourists. You fail to mention that the schoolkids in Soweto in 1976 were burning their schools to the ground and generally causing anarchy. Thia was under direct instruction from the ANC and their Policy of Liberation before Education. Meanwhile they the Mbeki's and Co were hiding in London etc mooching off the British taxpayer making sure they were not at risk. Others like Mandela were in jail or that scumbag wife of his was necklacing anyone who did not follow orders. You are truly deluded and Europeans would be well advised to check the history of South Africa before falling for the drivel that falls out of your mouth.

Turniton - It is called the Stockholme Syndrome ( you can Google it).

2007-03-12 09:20:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Terrorists are notorious cowards the world over and fight their so called war by killing civilians ( soft targets ) as they are not in a position to fight back. I was a member of the once proud SADF and was involved in many hot pursuit operations in Angola they just turned tail and ran every time like rabbits.The former cadres were good at intimidating unarmed villagers but wouldn't stand up to a platoon of well drilled troops as we all were in those days.

Tumi once again you show your ignorance and now i am sure you have been brain washed into believing what you have just stated, all the bomb blasts and shootings all over South Africa done with Russian weapons, no bricks and stones here , across the border in the neighbouring states they were armed with good Russian equipment but still they attacked civilians and did not fight man to man against the SADF.


UA RULES.

2007-03-12 07:14:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

Sickening.

They are trying to remove the role that the white people played to remove Apartheid. (The referendum put forward by F.W de Klerk in 1992)
http://www.answers.com/topic/south-african-referendum-1992

The whites are continually being sidelined and villainised more and more in SA.

What is even scarier are the psychological games that some whites will play with their own minds to convince themselves that all this is fair and deserved in the social environment that is South Africa.
This is to justify to themselves their continued existence in this sick environment.

Unfortunately when crime goes searching in "white" neighbourhoods it doesn´t skip the people with the signs that say "I´m enthusiastic about the New South Africa."

2007-03-12 12:23:59 · answer #4 · answered by turniton5 3 · 1 0

The scum currently running what used to be South Africa could never have taken the SADF one to one. Their so-called 'armed struggle' consisted of murdering civilians - men, women and children - whether through bombs or 'necklaces' - and playing on white guilt in countries like England and the USA.
It came back to bite the USA in the a*s though, when Mandela showed his gratitude by selling off tons of weaponry to terrorist nations in the Middle East during the 90's.

2007-03-12 06:41:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

so here's the thing, war was never pretty, HOWEVER, what the ANC has tried to do is beautify the slaughter of innocent people.

their own brand of urban guerilla warfare was brutal, disgusting and evil, yet they now try to put ex-terrorists who were responsible for the deaths of countless INNOCENT people on a pedastel.

once again the ANC has shown they can't think further than their noses.

2007-03-12 12:32:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Armed struggle....Yea right...it was a (''Stag-gal'' as ''they'' say it) to obtain Arms to Maim the innocent...and to make a statement in Blood....
That is why this present ''so called Goverment'' (Regime) will never be legitimate... as they ''Try'' to run the country with Blood Stained Hands...

Ps. Fancy any other country take a killer on as a President??

2007-03-12 13:52:35 · answer #7 · answered by §§ André §§ 3 · 0 0

They will convince themselves of anything. Looking at school textbooks it is very clear that they want generations following to believe that history only started when appartheid ended. It gives new meaning to the young earth theory.

As far as thoughts go, nothing they do will surprise me anymore, and I say that every day when they surprise me yet again.

2007-03-12 05:54:32 · answer #8 · answered by Rabble Rouser 4 · 3 1

I never realised that there were so many bitter whites living in SA. My God guys, more on already!

Raging Bull; on your way back from Bloem, you should've stopped at the Sharpeville Museum and seen how the Apartheid goverment shot and killed 69 people protesting againts the pass law in 1960.

After that, a stop should have been made at the Hector Peterson Memorial in Soweto and seen what white policemen used for target practice in 1976; 13 year old kids.

Your last stop should have been at the Apartheid Museum in Ormonde to see the general cruelty inflicted by the armed forces in the former SA republic.

The idiots you mention are ofcourse idiots but all is fair in love and war and the best offensive is to hit the enemy in the heart which is what both sides tried to do in killing innocent women and children.

2007-03-12 10:12:23 · answer #9 · answered by Wanda 2 · 1 7

You are dealing with a group here that chose liberation over education.

To me, that says it all.

Quite troubling though, I'd have to agree, is that history is being selectively re- written.

2007-03-12 06:37:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 7 1

fedest.com, questions and answers