hes really talented and the waarriors play a lot better with him. If he played 82 games evrey year/or almost, he would be a all-star for sure. But he seems to be so injury-prone. Should the Warriors be patient with him or dump him to get some other leader(Chris Paul like) that tends to stay healthier?
2007-03-11 18:39:25 · 15 answers · asked by thexpert888 2 in Sports ➔ Basketball
Your question is "is" he the face, to which the answer is yes. "Should" he though, would be a no. Paul, among others, is probably already a better player, and if not yet, he will be in a year or two. Davis, while flashy and a good scorer, is a bad decision-maker, turnover-prone, not much of a leader, has occaisional fits of selfishness and other attitude problems, doesn't play defense and, as you mentioned, is injury prone. Yes, i would take Chris Paul
2007-03-11 19:04:47 · answer #1 · answered by Teddyro 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sigh! Only God knows. Anybody in the NBA can get injured anytime. If Chris Mullin dumps him, there is no guarantee that the next point guard will always be injury-free. When Baron Davis is on the court, the Warriors can win some games. However, he is really injury-prone so I doubt that he can bring the Warriors to the playoff this year.
2007-03-11 18:59:43 · answer #2 · answered by Gene 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I feel that Baron Davis is the person who can keep the warriors in the game but even though he's always getting injured, he should be give a chance to prove himself to be the best in the warriors.
2007-03-12 03:33:26 · answer #3 · answered by Soaring 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the commerce i heard became into baron davis and al harrington for Chauncey billups and rasheed wallace. the pistons would income in those techniques: they get a veteran factor shelter who can run an gun, play protection, and hes been healthful the final couple years. additionally they get baron's expiring contract together as golden state would be caught with chaunceys. we would additionally additionally get somebody in return to play pf. baron ought to take this offense to a clean point that would run and play a million/2 court docket. additionally they receive harrington who's able to commencing. the squaddies would income in those techniques: they receive a huge guy and pg that have performed at the same time and would run or play a million/2 court docket. they receive a low submit possibility and 3 balls in the two sheed and chauncey. don nelson needed al harrington to be a three factor shooter, the place as sheed LOVES taking 3 tips. the squaddies additionally get sheeds expiring contract which permits a splash. and ultimately they get 2 veterans with jewelry who play protection!
2016-12-18 11:28:06 · answer #4 · answered by moncalieri 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately he is their face. The run and gun and play no defense face.
And should they drop him to pick up a Chris Paul type? Lol, as if there are guys like Chris Paul falling from the sky to come play in the NBA? Most teams would hope they could rebuild around a guy as talented as Chris Paul.
2007-03-11 18:48:21 · answer #5 · answered by nyrangers19942003 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the warriors have never had dominant inside play...Ive been watching the team for the last 35 or so years, and we watched a lot of games when my friends cousin played for the team (which was when they last won a title)...and ever since then (with the exception of Robert Parrish, who was improperly utilized) they didnt have one player who could always get his shot inside AND defended or rebounded well (mr mean was a great inside defender and rebounder but couldnt hurt you scoring), without that the warriors have been a score high, run, lose ...team...so it doesnt matter who is playing the 1 spot, they will develop or find someone to do that, (Ellis looks nice so far) but they will still be a run, score...lose team without rebounding and inside defense...
2007-03-12 03:07:46 · answer #6 · answered by doingitright44 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Monta Ellis is the face of the Warriors, they need to get a dominant big man....which can be had for Baron....and no Al Harrington is not dominant
2007-03-12 02:48:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is 1 of the deepest team in the NBA i feel.they could make the playoffs this year. J Rich is back. Keep Baron and see if he can stay healthy.
2007-03-11 18:48:32 · answer #8 · answered by whatitisandwhatitwillbe 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
face of the warriors,only if the warriors were a supermarket...'porkchop'would be the man...he is a really talented guy but he is never healthy..you cant get rid of him everyone knows he is damaged goods...but someone always wants to take the chance that he would push his wheelchair away from the dinner table...
2007-03-12 06:18:36 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont think there is no face of the warriors. baron is too injured to be considered that
the face of the franchise will be someone is the definite leader of the team, is always playing AND leads them to a playoff berth.
2007-03-12 06:03:34 · answer #10 · answered by carlos l 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋