2007-03-11 18:38:55 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://www.jonhs.net/911/
~witnessess & facts do not lie.
2007-03-11 18:42:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
that's real that there is no shown explanation for the cave in of making 7. in actuality, they actually even speculated. FEMA only dropped the ball on the study of that construction probably using fact it become no longer straight away hit via the hijacked planes and so only deemed to no longer certainly be slightly of the study of the terrorist attack. i think they only theory it would be seen yet another oddity of the day. i think their exclusion of a radical study of this become using their "loss of mind's eye" as to different significant events maximum appropriate as much as this attack that have been completely brushed off without study. whilst thinking the ensuing alterations in governing our u . s . a ., and the ramifications of those alterations, i might say that become a extensive mistake whether you have confidence it become an interior job or whether we are only left with the unknown element that we'd be heavily underestimating our enemy. extensive mistake.
2016-11-24 21:49:12 · answer #2 · answered by walpole 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why don't you tell us Brenda Nancy Lisa Katrina Cory Susy Q Dopy Doc Grumpy Sneezy Sleepy Bashful Ho Hum. Let me ask you this
Did you know about the massive protest happening nationwide next weekend?
2007-03-11 19:01:19 · answer #3 · answered by ohbrother 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Do you ever ask a real question? WTC didn't blow up. They finally had to bring it down to keep some measure of control over it.
2007-03-11 19:05:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
There was no need to explain an incident that was witnessed as it happened. Still trying to force your views on others I see.
2007-03-12 01:13:09 · answer #5 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Point out the passages in the report....I did not see them...as WTC 7 did not blow up it was damaged from the others falling on it.,,after a prolonged fire......I saw it....I was there.......
2007-03-11 18:45:04 · answer #6 · answered by Real Estate Para Legal 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Maybe because it collapsed after hours of fire exposure weakened its structure, you think?
Obviously, you were not anywhere near downtown that day. You, and others like you, should stop embarrassing yourselves.
2007-03-11 19:05:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Cause Dick Cheney and Karl Rove threatened everyone to keep their mouth shut. Is that what you want to hear Nancy?
2007-03-11 18:44:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I guess the grassy knoll got in the way again!
2007-03-11 18:54:37 · answer #9 · answered by childrenofthecorn 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Probably for the same reason no one can explain the existance of UFO's...Not enough evidence to point one way or another.
2007-03-11 18:42:25 · answer #10 · answered by Homeless in Phoenix 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋