English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If u were constantly suppressed for being different abd if u were targeted all ur life?? change to fit in or revolt back and keep ur old identity??


id rather evolt....I cant let someone who cant respect d fact tht im who i am change me......i am what i am, love me or hate i dnt give a damn...and infact, if u do the latter ull be d one in pain.lol....coz inflicting extreme psychological damage on someone DOES infact build up capacities to a max level, and itll be used against the exploiter and his kind..i still dnt get whts wrng with it. such ppl really dnt make a difference with their presence, and all they do is make life miserable 4 us....so y shudnt we like,...jus strike back??id rather strike back, show him wht he has done to me and mentally imprint the amount of damage tht he has done on ppl like me and leave him with so much of guilt tht hed be sorry tht hes alive...ha....psychological warfare is pretty much better,
sum say tht forgving d person and making himashamed of

2007-03-11 18:15:33 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Psychology

wht he did and hell be a nice person, but i say F**** him, i dnt think he needs tht, make him aware of his mistake, bring the truth in frnt of his face, make sure tht he knows tht he will not be forgiven and tht he wil not be accepted for his faults and tht shud make him feel wht i felt all my life....

2007-03-11 18:16:52 · update #1

3 answers

sweetie, u KNOW what i'd do. i'm the stupid, naive person who prefers to feel terrible about something others do to her rather than feel terrible about something i have done to others. somehow the latter adds that extra guilt that u r a bad person and that some day something bad will happen to u, just to balance the scale of life.

i know that sounds stupid and makes no sense to most ppl: "is that girl nuts? why be a pushover that everyone can shove around, when u can shove back and be given a little respect?" and heres my answer: respect isnt given, its earned.

being feared is not the same as being respected. ppl respect those who are WORTH being respected, ppl who r kind and who dont inflict pain and sufferring on others just to grant themselves pleasure. those r the ppl who everyone generally likes coz they make ppl feel good about themselves. yes its true that sometimes they make those "bad" ppl feel guilty about how bad they've treated them, but the bottom line, is that u can easily hate someone who's only bent on trying to get back at you, but its VERY difficult to hate someone who (no matter what you do to them) always treats u well and greets you with a smile. a person who is able to hate such a kind person, is simply HEARTLESS!!

so theres my answer for u... same as always, just expressed differently... LOL (hope ur not bored of hearing the same pacifist mumbo-jumbo over and over... but u know me... ;p )

2007-03-12 05:45:29 · answer #1 · answered by bukroot 4 · 0 0

Wudja Cudja was a UK-based gameshow hosted by Abbie Eastwood and Jayne Sharp, and was based off of the dares for cash principle, similar to such shows as I Bet You Will, and Indecent Proposals. It ran on and debuted ITV, and ran in reruns on Men and Motors.


The show would open with a monologue by the two hosts, usually loosely referencing what the contestants were to do, followed by a really quick montage of the following dares to come. Contestants were picked off the street at random, and most of the time, not even told what dare they were going to do prior, but what cash amount they were to receive.

The show also usually had a big challenge where 1,000 GBP were up for grabs. These were usually accumalitive three part challenges with each one getting worse. Money wasn't received for these until the last one was completed.

The show is usually done in a leaveoff format, in that the contestants tend to be already rounded up, skipping the process of finding them in the street more often than not. Transitions are coupled by quick montages.
am i giving u the right answer?

2007-03-12 01:19:48 · answer #2 · answered by kyrel 2 · 0 1

Gandhi made his impressions by using gentle resistance. Why revolt? It only robs you of your energy. Many of us are "repressed" by society but it only becomes a major issue if we make it one.

You can be your true authentic self w/out wasting your energy on showmanship. Revolting is a an action and a reaction.....and this chain can continue w/another action/reaction. Revolts of an size can create something much larger than what was intended and though it is your right to be yourself....you shouldn't need to take it this far.

Acceptance takes us a long way.....accepting that until society is close-minded we will always need to strengthen ourselves. My question to you is: what would make the greater impact? Revolting at your own cost or gently resisting and teaching others a lesson by example on how to be open-minded?

It seems to me that you are aware of having an anger issue and this is the larger issue not revolting. Try to see how far back this anger goes to see the incident(s) that led to this anger. Many times, anger (the cover for pain) can be traced to a single breaking incident. This can be done to heal yourself..done for yourself and not for them for you owe them nothing but you do owe it to yourself to give yourself the love, respect and acceptance you want from others.
Realize that you're the only one that can limit you. No one else has that kind of power of you. Good luck.

2007-03-12 16:39:17 · answer #3 · answered by anydaynow 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers