As world champ?
2007-03-11 16:12:14 · 18 answers · asked by David L 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
yes the undertaker is way better!!!!!!!
2007-03-11 16:19:36 · answer #1 · answered by under his feathers 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am one of the biggest Kane marks out there and Ill will freely admit Undertaker is a better champ. I do think Kane deserves a decent title reign before he retires. A one day championship is not good enough for a man that has given so much to the WWE.
2007-03-11 23:31:17 · answer #2 · answered by Jayson Kane 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Somewhat. Kane is a great wrestler, but Undertaker has the edge on him. The charachter is just awesome. He is super in the ring. Kane is still incredible but not quite at the level of Taker.
2007-03-11 23:35:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Mark Calaway has played probably the best character ever in the history of professional wrestling or at least in the WWF/WWE in the Undertaker, his record speaks for itself and he has been involved in some of the WWF/WWE's finest matches over the years such as Hell in a Cell with Shawn Michaels and Hell in a Cell and Boiler Room Brawl matches with Mick Foley.
On the other hand Glen Jacobs has tried his best with the Kane character but he is nothing but a mid-card wrestler and will never will be championship material.
2007-03-11 23:36:05 · answer #4 · answered by Rossie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Taker is 15-0 at Wrestlmania ... Although a better wrestler, I think Kane deserves to be champ.
2007-03-11 23:20:35 · answer #5 · answered by CaleeaLu 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I love Kane. He's a great wrestler. He's a maniac and he intimidates his opponents. He has a record of winning a handicap match in the less amount of time. He also has a record of eliminating the most men at the Royal Rumble. Undertaker has a winning streak at Wrestlemania and a decade of destruction. He's also a very intimidating wreslter. It's hard to choose one.
I'd say they are both great basing it on what they've both accomplished so far.
2007-03-11 23:26:11 · answer #6 · answered by [D.C] 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Undertaker is much better than Kane. Kane is just creepy. Undertaker is too, but he's creepy aaand good.
2007-03-15 21:29:41 · answer #7 · answered by Queen of Everything 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes Taker has held it 4 times and kane has never really been giving a chance to run with the title
2007-03-11 23:24:50 · answer #8 · answered by Corey B 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Under Taker:
6'10.5" 305 lbs
Kane:
7'0" 326lbs
While I think Kane is younger, the Undertaker looks bad a$$.
Too close to call.
2007-03-11 23:23:54 · answer #9 · answered by Teacher Man 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
how many times has kane been champ as opposed to the phenom and who is closer to becoming a champ
2007-03-11 23:16:51 · answer #10 · answered by jacey a 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Kane!
2007-03-11 23:18:31 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋