Political correctness is the problem for the libs. Conservatives are better spin doctors, and letting others think for them makes it easy for the herd to avoid having to read or become familiar with the complicated issues that go beyond a 30 second sound byte.
Bush has a huge backbone, but it has slipped down into his a**
2007-03-11 16:15:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Rockvillerich 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The bigger question is not what lies are spreading in elections. Debating what each side has or has not done does not require a backbone. Right or left, how do you expect anyone to address such daunting tasks such as:
Elections, Corporate Power, Civil Liberties, Civil Rights, Criminal Justice, Education, Culture and Science, Reproductive Rights, Immigration, Economic Justice, Taxes, Health Care, Hunger and Poverty, Housing, Social Security, Labor Rights, Military Personnel, Veterans Relations, National Security, Military Spending, Human Rights and International Law, Foreign Aid, Ecology and Sustainability, Globalization, Community Revitalization, Global Warming, Energy, Water Accessibility, Pollution, Conservation, just to name a few.
The solution lies with you and me, no one person can solve such problems. Demanding accountability in elections is a ludicrous unachievable dream. So what we as Americans do efficiently and consistently is pay taxes and complain. There is your backbone.
2007-03-11 17:46:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by GO HILLARY 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well if you poke a stick in their cages you know what you will get. The liberal label has been hijacked by the socialists in the democratic party. The real wackos on the far left have managed to drag the once great democratic party much too far to the left.
At one time, the democratic party was second to none when it came to defending America. FDR used every used the full might of America's might to fight WWII. Harry Truman drooped the Atomic Bomb on Japan.
The democratic party was second to none in championing liberty for all oppressed people in the world, There was a time the democratic party would be on the front lines fighting for the rights of Muslim women in the world.
No more, sad to say.
2007-03-11 16:41:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jacob W 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I love how people on here think that Bush just "happened" to this country... uh, he was ELECTED. Anywho, I agree. While I do not completly idetify with one party or the other, it is interesting how it is the liberals that have helped us get invloved in and "start losing" this war. Hello, if they would quit their whining and let us kick *** like we've almost always done then it would be over by now. To bad they have stopped having a purpose worth writing home about, and become more of a whining baby with a dirty diper and an attitude that desperatly needs to be changed. Oh well, at least I can take comfort in knowing that my husband fights for their right to b*itch and they'll never be thankfull for it, but I will just for the entertainment. God belss you!
2007-03-11 16:41:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
both sides of the coin are full of crap, but the bush administration is the most corrupt group in our country's history, and this is coming from a former conservative republican. i served in the first gulf war and was proud to do so, and it makes me so incredibly angry that the young men today need to be over there even when the entire country doesnt want it to be so, and this has done nothing other than bankrupt our country. no weapons found, we're no safer, americans are getting shot daily in Iraq, our vets arent getting taken care of, our citizens were neglected in a time of national disaster, real estate is down, the stock market is down, gas prices are up..... want me to continue? as we speak theres a debate over how to punish the men in the FBI who have abused their power, and dont say they havent, because they're openly admitting it. democrats dont have all the answers, but at least they're open to each other's ideas, if a republican doesnt agree with other republicans, they wont even let him sit at the same lunch table in the senate..... its like junior high and its sickening. the republicans are the worse of the bunch right now, thats for sure.
bush has had no answers, no solutions, and scooter libby is the first person in 6 years to have been held accountable for what he's done. i cant believe you're bringing up lies and morality. ..... this entire war and presidency are built upon lie after lie. you need to actually analyze the words that are spoken to you from both sides and not just go along with one side blindly. if bush was really so great, wouldnt more than 30% of the people support him? a large percentage of republicans dont even want anything to do with him...... thats not just happening for no reason.
2007-03-11 16:20:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, i don't have self belief that she is the worst. besides the undeniable fact that, she is the worst revealed author that i have ever examine a e book by technique of(key terms: "revealed author" and "i have ever examine"). I particularly have examine some stuff by technique of unpublished authors that made Stephanie Meyer look like the queen of marvelous literature. And save in my ideas that I stated that she is largely the worst that I particularly have ever study: i have in no way claimed that she is the worst ever. inspite of the truth that, obviously, this question is more suitable directed on the individuals who flow round being immature jerks and troll the Twilight questions. I do actually have a dislike for the Inkworld Trilogy, and Cornelia Funke mainly. And if textual content books count number, then Saxon Math, Algebra a million. That e book made me flow loopy! Edit: AW! My thoughts are so damage by technique of easily everyone affirming Paolini is terrible! .... ok, properly perhaps the writing isn't the perfect *cough*cough* besides the undeniable fact that the plot is reliable and for being in reality fifteen even as he began, he did a rather reliable activity at coming up the religions and traditions of elves and dwarves.
2016-12-01 20:55:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe you have been paying attention of late.
They can't even back up their campaign promises for fear that they could well find themselves on the wrong side of the war in Iraq. That, however, doesn't stop their rhetoric and efforts to discredit Bush - in their narrow sighted, all important race to regain the White House in 2008.
It's a sad commentary for a political party that has given us many great leaders in the past. Sad, indeed.
2007-03-11 16:22:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree, GWB and him minions know what they stand for, spreading lies, false truths, slandering others to keep scrutiny off themselves, doing anything necessary (even immoral acts) to win an election and turning on their own ranks rather than fess up. thank you for defining what the republicans stands for!
2007-03-11 16:18:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Alan S 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yea they are kind of nutty but the radical left and their adgendas are small in comparison to the rest of the country that still has it's collective heads screwed on.
Thank you MIDDLE AMERICA-- don't let us down.
2007-03-11 16:31:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by caciansf 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Could not have said it better myself.
I'm guessing that after they give away all our freedoms and rights through concessions to appease extremists factions they will be singing a different tune, if we're around.
2007-03-12 12:14:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Nighthawk 2
·
0⤊
0⤋