Well, I think Berbatov should play in much stronger team such as Liverpool at least...
2007-03-11 15:25:00 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football ➔ Other - Football
He is good but not that good. I think Bellamy is much better and he plays in Liverpool. GO ARSENAL.
2007-03-11 15:45:24 · answer #1 · answered by Rafa! 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's if you think Spurs are a weak team, which is far from the truth. They are one of the strongest sides in the Premiership made better by the likes of Berbatov. Had Spurs not been crushed by injuries of key players early on in the season I think that they would be in the top four along with Arsenal and Liverpool. We held the fourth place position for a good length of the 2005/06 season above the arsenal scum. I think Spurs are right up there with the top clubs, but the only difference is that they lack the funding to create the type of depth that the Man U, Chelsea, Liverpool, and Arsenal have attained.
2007-03-12 11:42:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Spurs are not a weak team.
From the way you word this, you seem like you're not British so you probably don't realise but traditionally Spurs are one of the big clubs.
They are historically a more sucessful side than Chelsea and probably on a par with Arsenal. I actually support Chelsea but will concede that Tottenham have had great success in the past and there are as many Tottenham fans where I live as there are Chelsea and Arsenal.
Tottenham are a London club and for many foreign players, they would far rather live in a metropolitan capital city like London than in a northern city like Liverpool. I'm not saying there is anything at all wrong with Liverpool, but it doesn't quite have the blend of nationalities London does and I can see why some foreigners would think like this.
Liverpool aren't a vastly better side than Tottenham. And they have four strikers already.
2007-03-13 17:41:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the concept of loyalty to the team has become so rarely seen nowadays that when an example such as this comes up, people don´t get it. Bayer Leverkusen have pretty much made Dimitar Berbatov´s career and, due to this, he owes them a lot, so just dumping the team when they are going through a pretty bad slump is just not right, even when a lot of players are doing so right now (e.g. Juventus post-Moggigate and the whole Kaka-to-Madrid affair). Now, if he really wanted out of Bayer, he could get a job in teams that really need a forward, like Manchester United, Villareal, Newcastle or Benfica, but I think that he really wants to stay and try to help the team back up, instead of just leaving and sentencing the team he owes his career to go down in flames.
You could argue that staying in Bayer has hurt Dimitar´s career, but he´s still a pretty good option for many teams around, so that still gives him some importance on the European scene. And, of course, there´s always the MLS...
2007-03-11 17:16:17 · answer #4 · answered by Last Son 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is good enough as a striker. He is not in a weak team. He plays for an unlucky team, because although Spurs have good players, they were hit by players' injuries.
2007-03-12 00:05:33 · answer #5 · answered by r083r70v1ch 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Technically hes very good and could play for one of the big teams in future.
2007-03-11 16:11:24 · answer #6 · answered by Mr. 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Spurs are enough for him. he is not great!
2007-03-11 19:00:47 · answer #7 · answered by abdosdt 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋