2007-03-11 14:44:08 · 17 answers · asked by Robb the B.D.C. 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Ok, for those with little understanding of questions, you chose one or the other.
2007-03-11 14:52:49 · update #1
(a), provided the beer and cheese remained constant.
2007-03-12 11:00:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Poor but happy. You can't be content with life if you're always wanting more and more. I'm not poor just now, but I don't go for the best of things in life as I make do with what I have.
2007-03-12 11:10:46 · answer #2 · answered by ~Kitana~ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
poor but happy
2007-03-11 21:52:46 · answer #3 · answered by tinigirl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Poor but happy of course. You can stick your materialistic junk and stick it where the sun don't shine.
2007-03-11 22:00:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rich & Itchy! At least you've got lots of money to pay for camomile lotion & people to scratch you.
2007-03-12 00:35:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
poor but happy, that means a lot to your health
2007-03-11 22:37:17 · answer #6 · answered by rosepink 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lol itchy where ? i have to say rich and itchy i will have enough to take care of the itch thing lol
2007-03-11 21:50:13 · answer #7 · answered by canielany 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
eczemas a btch - hope that filaggrin stuff works out.
laughs at the foolishness of those who said rich and itchy - the fools the fools
2007-03-11 21:48:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Poor and happy. Money can not make anyone happy unless they are happy first.
--That Cheeky Lad
2007-03-11 23:50:47 · answer #9 · answered by Charles-CeeJay_UK_ USA/CheekyLad 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
poor but happy if your happy u would ahve no need to be rich
2007-03-11 21:57:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would choose poverty with happiness, although if i relly had to choose, i would like to not have to worry about finances. Being fantastically wealthy is not a specific need.
2007-03-11 22:09:32 · answer #11 · answered by shortarsetitch 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋