2007-03-11 14:24:26 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
HILLARY,, Rudy can't get the support of the GOP,, the right wingers ,, the born-again will not support his views on marriage,, abortion,, and gun control,, unless they cut and run from their religion
2007-03-11 14:37:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Hillary Clinton.
2007-03-11 15:33:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Your question is amazingly a poser! returned in the coolest ol' days whilst honest human beings ran for workplace and have been held to intense standards via different honest human beings, we'd have rallied in the back of whichever one become elected. that's a painful element for me to ought to correctly known that a scenario such using fact the only you advise ought to even happen, yet, unluckily and alack, it certainly ought to come to bypass. For myself, the snake i be attentive to is extra useful than the only i do no longer. A rattlesnake provides a warning. that must be Rudi. Clinton is hiding her fangs and poison. i be attentive to she's poison yet i don't be attentive to whilst or the place she would be able to strike. So, i think the respond for me is Rudi. Our u . s . a . seems to be lost already and the will of the persons to regain it would not seem coming returned any time quickly so, my suggestion is to compliment the snake you be attentive to. this is toughest question i've got seen on right here!
2016-11-24 21:27:39 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rudy
2007-03-11 15:20:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
There is no way I'd vote for either liberal!!
However for the sake of this question I'd have to say I'd vote for the supreme liberal Hillary. I'd vote for her because I'd love to see her in action when the next big terrorists attack hits America. She would have to do what all the liberals said Bush did wrong. Because Bush was right. Any fool would have to figure that Saddam delivered all his WMD to Syria. There is a book out written by an Iraqi general that states the fact that these WMD went to Syria. If only Bush would deliver on his promise to destroy terrorists states like Syria.
2007-03-11 14:58:18 · answer #5 · answered by Gina P 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Democrat for Rudy.
2007-03-11 14:54:48 · answer #6 · answered by kevin t 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I'm a New York moderate Republican, have never voted for a democrat for president . . . .
No way I would vote for carpet-bagger Clinton. She hasn't done anything for the State or the country since she rode her husband's legacy into the Senate.
Rudy is an interesting choice . . . but I'm not convinced he has the temperament or character to be president.
Right now, and it is WAY too early to make any kind of definite decision, I am leaning towards . . . . {gasp} Obama.
If Fred Thompson gets in the race he'll almost certainly vault into the lead though . . . .
2007-03-11 14:40:35 · answer #7 · answered by John B 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
If I absolutely had to choose between those two for President, I'd pick Giuliani.
I disagree with most of his politics, but he seems intelligent enough to actually consider the consequences of his actions, while having enough courage to not be afraid to make decisions.
Clinton (Hillary) is too much the politician, and doesn't seem to have independent initiative on enough of the major issues.
2007-03-11 14:39:05 · answer #8 · answered by coragryph 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
I'd definitely do a write in candidate or sometimes it helps to get someone out to just vote against one. Like if I am a Republican and can vote against a strong democrat, it is sometimes better than voting for my own man, it depends what stage the election is at. sneaky politics
2007-03-11 14:54:14 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Easy. Rudy!
2007-03-11 14:27:33 · answer #10 · answered by Apachecat 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋