This is something that's been bugging me for a few days now - the avian group is usually associated with the Theropoda, which is an off-shoot from the lizard-hipped Saurischia. The Ornithischia are always depicted as a widely separate branch, yet the earliest known dinosaurs are Theropods (Eoraptor, Herrerrasaurus, etc), so isn't is more likely that the bird-like hip evolved once and that the common ancestor of (for instance) birds and hadrosaurs is closer than the common ancestor of birds and sauropods as the diagrams usually suggest? Or am I missing something here and the likelihood of the hips evolving twice are much greater than they seem?
2007-03-11
13:27:41
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Earth Sciences & Geology
Just to address the 2 answers received so far:
It could have evolved twice, but is that necessarily the most likely answer? The traditional view is that birds evolved from Theropods which include all two legged carnivorous dinosaurs, and these are in the lizard hipped group along with Sauropods - even the ones with more bird-like hips are counted as lizard-hipped dinosaurs by definition. Given that our earliest dinosaurs are Theropods, that all known families of dinosaur originate from these common ancestors, and that there are theropods with both hip variations, isn't it much more likely that an early Theropod with bird-like hip could be the common ancestor for not only birds themselves, but the entirety of the bird-hipped dinosaurs (stegosaurus, hadrosaurs, triceratops, the lot)? Or is there an indication in the hips of the ornithischia that show signs of convergence like the difference between a dolphin chest cavity and an icthyosaur - 2 origins for the same shape?
2007-03-13
14:43:32 ·
update #1