2007-03-11 12:45:46 · 18 answers · asked by Andrew1968 5 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
From what we saw in the papers when they were a couple she seemed to have a lot of his money spent on promoting the causes she was pushing. McCartney plugs the causes as he has done all his life as he did with Linda, Miss Mills seems to plug a cause to achieve fame.
Did she help him write a song, or sing them? So has she earnt any of the money?
She should have to fend for herself, their daughter however will be looked after as we have seen.
All pictures in the paper always seem to have Mr McCartney holding the baby so to speak.
Enough Said....
2007-03-12 01:36:49 · answer #1 · answered by Moneyloser 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Gold digger
2007-03-11 17:39:02 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Gold digger!
2007-03-11 14:50:05 · answer #3 · answered by monza 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no i don't think she is a gold digger.
Money talks louder than the poor.
Besides no-one will ever know what went on behind closed doors.
$25m is peanuts to mccartney.
people talk about the girl what about him chasing skirt half his age.
There will always be 3 truths to any event in history. The winners truth, the losers truth and then the absolute truth (which on-one knows)
2007-03-11 21:18:06 · answer #4 · answered by jan b 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
YES, definately gold digger.
2007-03-11 12:50:12 · answer #5 · answered by Jeanette 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She is also a fame junkie and signing up with dancing with the stars when in the middle of such a high profile divorce proves that.
2007-03-11 15:08:08 · answer #6 · answered by molly 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
like most females that marry a rich guy.
what the hell does she need so much money for anyway?
men are forced to pay huge sums of cash on divorce, whoever was at fault, to #keep he rin the manner to which she has become accustomed'....well, it was the bloke that gave her that life so she should lose it and go back to what she had before the marriage, makes me sick to the teeth to see women claiming that sort of obscene cash
2007-03-11 18:55:00 · answer #7 · answered by safcian 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course she is! Why else would she have married a man so much older than herself. And then they had a daughter. Child support on top of much of his possessions. She won't have to lift a finger again in her life.
2007-03-11 14:44:37 · answer #8 · answered by Bud's Girl 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
was going to ask similar q earlier but was afraid id get violated,i honestly,i dont think she has earned the right to be given 25 million,he shud stand his ground cos i cant honestly see him as the violent type from what shes said about him,and i think he shud get full custody of the child
2007-03-11 14:00:36 · answer #9 · answered by lees 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No she is not as macca said.She can have 10 million any more,and she wouldn't have a leg to stand on.
2007-03-11 12:53:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋