English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

nope BUSH DID

but but but bush never lies


dum repukes
ha ha ha ha h ah ahh ah ah ahah a

2007-03-11 12:23:15 · 11 answers · asked by WMD LIEr W 1 in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

The CIA's intel was bad. That is not a lie.

2007-03-11 12:26:43 · answer #1 · answered by producer_vortex 6 · 1 2

No. The weapons have been there, we merely gave them adequate time to get the information out to Syria jointly as Saddam replaced into enjoying a shell sport with the UN inspectors. If the Libs hadn't been so adamant approximately desiring us to watch for each and all the inspection comments to come again in, we could have caught them in time.

2016-10-01 23:15:45 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No they were just wrong along with the British Intelligence as well as the Russian Intelligence. They all said Iraq had WMD

2007-03-11 12:35:35 · answer #3 · answered by 1st Buzie 6 · 2 0

Democratic Senator Torricelli, before he was forced to resign because of corruption with the help of Sen Schumer and on a party line vote passed the Torricelli Doctrine that made it illegal for the C.I.A. and the F.B.I. to exchange information on terrorist. It forbade the C.I.A. from using anyone that was not a choir boy to gather intelligence. It cut the legs out from under the C.I.A. and their ability to protect us. Bush had to get Congress to repeal it and the Demos kept blocking it again limiting the information the C.I.A could collect.

2007-03-11 12:32:15 · answer #4 · answered by ohbrother 7 · 0 1

Actually it wasn't so much the CIA but Dick "Darth Vadar" Cheny, he's created his own intelligence community andas repeatedly asked for "raw" data meaning intel that hasn't been veted for accuracy so he can draw conclusions to support his demented world view

2007-03-11 12:58:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The cia, russian, british, jordanian, and egyptian intelligence agencies were wrong.

2007-03-11 13:02:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Fush Buck

2007-03-11 12:54:57 · answer #7 · answered by Jose G 3 · 0 2

Current working theory is that the reports were misleading, by presenting only the evidence that supported their conclusions.

Whether half-truths and withheld information count as "lies" is a semantic debate that you're welcome to have on your own.

2007-03-11 12:26:22 · answer #8 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2 0

no kidding...it's already come out that the intelligence said there weren't WMD's and Bush told them to change it....he misused the intelligence or rather, he didn't use it at all....bottom line, he lied to the American people and he lied to congress.

2007-03-11 12:51:09 · answer #9 · answered by Paulien 5 · 0 2

no.the U.S. bought the wmd's for iraq when they were fighting iran

2007-03-11 13:49:00 · answer #10 · answered by nate 2 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers