and bush did not get bad wmd info, he lied
2007-03-11 12:05:16 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think the best person to answer that one would be the parents of one of our soldiers who's been killed in Iraq.
I think one of the folks who whines about Clinton could ask them "do you think your child suffered more from Clinton geting oral sex, or from the bomb that killed them in Iraq?"
All politicians lie. But not all lies cause deaths.
2007-03-11 12:19:50 · answer #1 · answered by Havick 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Clinton lies were personal between him and his wife I would not want anyone to be involed in my personal life lets face it he was not the only president who smoked cigars how was that going to hurt the american people Bush is getting bad info
2007-03-11 12:23:52 · answer #2 · answered by Verna I 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush's lies were much more detrimental. Clinton lying about his personal life is not something that affects our citizens or the citizens of anywhere else. It is falacious to ridicule president Clinton on something that is irrelevent to the job he has done as president. By the way, I bet a lot of people lie about there sex lives to the public. It is none of anybody else's business anyway. WMD's are everybody's business.
2007-03-11 12:14:42 · answer #3 · answered by Eisbär 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Bush lies are worse! Clinton only lied about getting head!
2007-03-11 12:09:57 · answer #4 · answered by Gemini Girl 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Well, actually Bush's are. While Clinton lied, he lied about fiddling around on his wife, certainly an understandable lie. Would anyone have expected him to tell the truth about it?
On the other hand, I really do expect the pres to be upfront about the reasons we're going to ask young kids to die for this country. In stead of being upfront, he enlisted the aid of the press to print intentional leaks of other inaccurate information to discredit his critics.
2007-03-11 12:15:07 · answer #5 · answered by webned 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Clinton lied, Monica had to get a new dress. Bush lied, thousands of soldiers died.
Now you tell me. Which is worse?
2007-03-11 12:24:40 · answer #6 · answered by katydid 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hey if Clinton wants to get his d#ck sucked, then that is his wife's problem--it does not effect the actual job he does.
If you were dying would you give a d^mn if the surgeon working on you was cheating on his wife?
On the other hand, Bush has been one lie after another, on things that are a part of his job (like leading the country into a frivolous war)
My vote--Bush is the greater of the two evils.
2007-03-11 12:11:49 · answer #7 · answered by frenchie 4 · 6⤊ 2⤋
bush's lies anybody's name who refers to the hair of a penis is obviously a liar yes bush you have no bush down below
2007-03-11 12:52:19 · answer #8 · answered by ? 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hmmm you can't prove Bush lied. However it was proven in a court of law that Clinton lied. You're question is moot. Kindly remove your whiney liberal head from your rectum before trying to ask any futther questions.
2007-03-11 12:34:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
the question answers itself. Lies resulting in a massive number of innocent deaths. or a lie - which was really no one's business but the Clintons.
Few in public service want anyone to know anything about their private lives anyway. So Monica serviced him. So what! Many many men IN GOVERNMENT do the same thing. Most are married. And they lie about it. Most men are dogs anyway. What else is new!
2007-03-11 12:14:21 · answer #10 · answered by rare2findd 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋