English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Let's not take our eye off the fact that he was lying to cover up who leaked Valerie Plame's CIA status.

Who do you think he was protecting?

Why isn't Fitzgerald going after those guilty of this leak?

Remember Bush stated he wanted names to prosecute and hold accountable for leaking a CIA agents name!!!

2007-03-11 11:58:54 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

12 answers

Oh come on...He was trying to cover for his boss. Happens everyday in this country. A subordinate will try to make his superior look good and the superior will stab the poor bastid in the back in a heartbeat...happens everywhere from McDonald's to WalMart to IBM to our wonderful government...When is this country going to smarten up and value leadership over butt kissing.

2007-03-11 12:08:44 · answer #1 · answered by jeff_loves_life 3 · 1 2

You are incorrect in your assumption. It has already been revealed who leaked the name, and it had nothing to do with the Bush Admin. There was nothing to lie about as far as that goes. The jury came to an incorrect conclusion imo but at any rate, this had nothing to do the leak of Plame's identity, this was a trial on a completely seperate matter. He was essentially found guilty of a non-crime.

2007-03-11 19:12:17 · answer #2 · answered by The Scorpion 6 · 2 0

Do you even know what the lie was? What he was convicted for lying about was whether or not he recalled telling someone something. Man that's a 25 year sentence crime in my book.

There was no leak that's why.

2007-03-11 19:07:04 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 2 0

Valerie Plame wasn't completely undercover!

2007-03-11 19:06:08 · answer #4 · answered by godlyteengirl 3 · 1 1

Hey he's a politician and it's CYOA.

He knew that Clinton got away with lying to cover up his having sex with his AID (s) in the Oval Office so he figured that "what the heck", forgetting something was no big deal.

2007-03-11 19:03:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Who knows but I wish they would go after real crooks like Sandy "The shredder" berger and William "cold cash" Jefferson.

2007-03-11 19:02:50 · answer #6 · answered by aiminhigh24u2 6 · 2 1

Keep digging you'll get to the truth eventually and then you might realize that not everything you read in the lib papers is true.

2007-03-11 19:02:28 · answer #7 · answered by archangel72901 4 · 1 1

Dick Cheney no doubt about it. Anybody who doesn't think so needs to have there head examined

2007-03-11 19:11:38 · answer #8 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 1 2

He is at least covering for Cheney and perhaps George

2007-03-11 19:03:16 · answer #9 · answered by Experto Credo 7 · 1 3

He is protecting Dick Cheney.

Scooter is just the begining of the corruption trail.

2007-03-11 19:02:48 · answer #10 · answered by Villain 6 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers