Yes, they are anatomically correct.
I would feel better though if a guy wasn't asking this question though, but the fact stll remains.
2007-03-11 12:53:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Interesting, you know. Both were actually made to a mathematical formula, to do with the angle between chin, nose and forehead.
The Greek statues had the slightly greater angle, and are generally considered to be closer to the hypothetical ideal of "beauty".
2007-03-11 12:03:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well if you really have a thing for statues I think if you get caught in Rome doing anything to them you will server less time than doing something to a statue in Grease. At least bring a washcloth.
2007-03-11 11:59:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Reported.
2007-03-11 11:58:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by fatto_in_napoli 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
greek statues are mostly nude but italians are not and most of antic greek people are both likes man and women but hadrian (a ROMAN EMPEROR) had a boy friend from bolu turkey ı am an archeologist so ı know these
2007-03-12 13:30:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by yusuf t 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
ACTUALLY THEY ARE IDENTICAL.
ON THE LEFT OBSERVE THE GREEK ORIGINAL IN BRONZE
http://www.ancientworlds.net/aw/Article/736795
THE ROMAN COPY IS IN MARBLE AND HAS A STAND ON THE RIGHT SIDE.
2007-03-11 12:13:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by tουΖουrs 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
LOL yes they are wayy hotter that greek statues
2007-03-11 11:57:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I couldn't really choose but their both to a certain extent, hot.
2007-03-11 12:05:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Indira B 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
are you a man?
contemplating the hot factor of male stautes?
that is bizarre and gross.
2007-03-11 11:57:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by ice cream lovaaa 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
So you **** statues too?
What is that they call such people? Hmm...Pansexuals. Ready to try anything. Yuck
2007-03-11 19:15:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by SAPPHIRE 3
·
1⤊
1⤋