Be logical and give a reasonable answer.
2007-03-11 11:49:10 · 8 answers · asked by Gary B 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Nothingness is a perceptional paradox, because it can be perceived(otherwise we wouldn't think about it), but it cannot be contained(we cannot grasp it). Ergo, it is useless to think about it!0!
Or maybe it is not that useless.... Sapere Aude!
2007-03-11 12:03:33 · answer #1 · answered by Alex 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing is a word we use to describe the opposite of something. If nothing were something it would probably be anti-matter, space, time, energy.
2007-03-11 12:22:17 · answer #2 · answered by Who's got my back? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Before there was something, there was nothing until God created everything.
2007-03-11 14:31:44 · answer #3 · answered by butterfly 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe we're nothing, literally.
2007-03-11 12:10:36 · answer #4 · answered by shmux 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
conclusion to this premise:something is nothing.
2007-03-11 15:00:25 · answer #5 · answered by olnly1GOD 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Something else .
2007-03-11 12:21:11 · answer #6 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
figure it out Gary...
now do you see nothing Gary?????
2007-03-12 07:23:49 · answer #7 · answered by ﺸÐïåMóñdÐôññåﺸ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There be you.
2007-03-11 11:54:38 · answer #8 · answered by siaosi 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋