George, as we can always fire Ann coulter
2007-03-11 11:37:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Experto Credo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would say the unnecessary war, however, i freakin love George Bush!! I definitely wouldn't say the gay-slur is worse because 1) Ann Coulter is awesome 2) I DO NOT believe in homosexuality AT ALL! The reason i don't is because I am 100% Christian and the Holy Bible itself states that homosexuality is wrong and 3) The gays just need to freakin get over Ann's comments
2007-03-11 12:48:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by ripcurlgurl30 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
George Bush, since he actually has power.
I don't really care what Ann Coulter said. She has a right to say whatever she wants, and the majority of people should realize that nothing good ever comes out of her mouth anyway, so there is no point in giving this woman any more publicity than she needs, which is none, mind you.
2007-03-11 11:15:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Justin 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If i have my way all of humanity will profit from this war and none of the lives lost will have been wasted. Making Pres. Bush a kind of unconscious hero. Don't know A Coulter, from the answers I've read she's opinionated but her opinions don't matter. Makes them equal. Both having about the same amount of relevancy to me.
Who controls the oil resources of that war torn land has a great deal of relevancy to me. I want control of those resourses. My plans are best for humanity.
2007-03-11 11:41:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gosh, both are bad but many of died because of Bush. Or I guess I should say Cheney, since Bush isn't smart enough to realize all the damage he's done. However, both should be impeached for the lives they have destroyed.
Ann Coulter knows perfectly well what she's doing and loves the effect her raw sewage has on others. She trash and loves being it.
2007-03-11 11:27:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Cindy P 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
the gay community couldn't care less about what Ann Coulter as to say,where as the % of the community detests what Bush is doing.
2007-03-11 11:30:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by TOM 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush is much worse. His actions have resulted in many deaths. Coulter is just a hate-monger and a media whore.
2007-03-11 11:16:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I doubt absolutely everyone in this thread is conscious even if it truly is significant or no longer. the authorities went to conflict on Iraq bc they believed they were education terrorists, resembling bill Clinton did even as he approved air strikes the week of the Lewinsky tale damage. We believed he had WMD, which we and one hundred,000 Kurdish households said firsthand. like it or no longer, the conflict became justified to eliminate a dictator who invaded our greatest buddy in 1990 and were continually capturing at our plane for the years between the wars. in case you imagine he could were reasoned with, you ought to have hopped a plane and tried. And gotten beheaded bc loose-speech it truly is equipped to you the following, isn't accessible for thousands of thousands global huge. and that is worth struggling with for. Its ordinary to Monday morning quarterback. on your opinion, what number American corpses do you want to make certain mendacity between fragments of Iranian-made hardware before you imagine they are in contact? how are you going to have self belief they are in reality interested in non violent nuclear technologies even as they gained't enable inspectors in to verify? The evidence is there and one could look with readability of objective and information of overseas coverage and be armed with more suitable than only a pipe dream of what could be in a simplistic comic-e book reality. Please do not ever run for public place of work. except in Iran.
2016-12-01 20:36:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ann gives me the creeps !
2007-03-11 11:30:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by michelle 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
they are both satans babies lol but seriously ann coulter that was so uncalled for she is way far out there
2007-03-11 11:12:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by undercovernudist 6
·
0⤊
1⤋