2007-03-11 10:08:37 · 10 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
diamond (below) All repubs/conservatives are NOT neo-cons. You seem not to be one so this is definately NOT addressed against you.
2007-03-11 10:16:31 · update #1
shringk (below) Excellent point about free speach. I never advocated taking Rush off of the air. I will always advocate calling an ignorant, hate filled wind bag just that. He has every right to lie to his listeners as it is a free country.
I also thank you for your response and your views.
2007-03-11 10:18:54 · update #2
I can't stand Rush Limbaugh. Anyone with a brain doesn't either. Calling me a neo-con makes you a demacritic.
Thank you, and if demacritic doesn't fit you, I am sorry.
It is too bad that there are some who have to fill the air with hate and rhetoric comments.
2007-03-11 10:11:33 · answer #1 · answered by Sparkles 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well Limbaugh brought the neo-cons to a new level, then of course came Fox..
Limbaugh says all the mean neo-con stuff, so most neocons will agree with him.
As for the free speech thing, Limbaugh can say whatever he wants; so can Coulter.
And, hell, I am for the legalization of drugs, so Rus can have his ILLEGAl drug habit (the neocons want to keep drugs illegal, not the dems.. marijuana?
2007-03-11 10:18:43 · answer #2 · answered by Richard A 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. He says something I don't agree with every day. His latest thing was his 30 minute rant about how he was responsible for the success of the Republican party.
He has some good points but he is just on because I'm waiting for Sean Hanity to come on next.
2007-03-11 10:13:01 · answer #3 · answered by kittenbrower 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL, Rush is not a neo-con and anyone who thinks he is doesn't understand the definition of the word or what Rush stands for.
2007-03-11 10:22:07 · answer #4 · answered by archangel72901 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I still don't know what you consider a "neo-con" to be. But I don't really care what you think about Rush Limbaugh, personally.
Just stop trying to take away his rights to free speech. Yes, and ditto Ann Coulter. Why is it that Liberals cannot tolerate anyone to disagree with them?
2007-03-11 10:12:15 · answer #5 · answered by Shrink 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
you're complicated the Democrats with Republicans again. enable's take the hot Foley gafe as an party. that is the very definition of political opportunism. If Republicans had determined to secret agent on Foley for sending overly pleasant e-mails to pages, Democrats could were screaming about a Republican witch-hunt hostile to gays. yet in the journey that they don't, they are permitting a sexual predator. we favor to get a rulebook from the Democrats: -- Boy Scouts: As gay as you want to be. -- clergymen: No gays! -- Democratic politicians: Proud gay individuals. -- Republican politicians: Presumed to blame. -- White living house press corps: No gays, until eventually they hate Bush. -- lively-responsibility U.S. protection stress: As gay as accessible. Democrats %. and choose who're allowed to be gay. desire yet another party... Black conservatives/Republicans are villanous traitors, Uncle Toms, sellouts, tokens, and bigger offensive slurs that i do not care to repeat.
2016-12-01 20:32:24 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
rush limpball listeners ran out of SEX PILLS
they dont get any
and are MAD AND FRUSTRATED at the world
2007-03-11 10:23:51 · answer #7 · answered by WMD LIE p 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope, not true but it is true that we believe bonehead liberals should be put to sleep like old dogs.
2007-03-11 10:11:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes thats true.
2007-03-11 10:12:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Or, Ann Coulter for that matter.
2007-03-11 10:12:25 · answer #10 · answered by CC 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋