English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

yes
that how it works
vietnam did NOT attack us
they opened chinese rest.

2007-03-11 10:02:03 · 13 answers · asked by DumbsField o 1 in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

no,, and it won't be Clinton's fault that GWB failed as president either,,,

2007-03-11 10:06:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We did indeed unify Vietnam with our war. But it appears we have to stay in Iraq even if it means America will go broke and lose 10,000 troops.
All America needs to do is continue tolerating conservative special rights like they receiving the war profits and tax decreases, while the rich also do not serving in the military in Iraq.
It is a small price for having the richest people in the world living on American Billionaire Welfare.
Don't you agree?
I do wonder if it was worth 70,000 young American lives for some Vietnamese style Chinese food.

2007-03-11 10:27:02 · answer #2 · answered by zclifton2 6 · 0 0

The troops would only be removed when it would become certain to the USA that the war in Iraq would continue on without the presence of the American troops. If the Iraqis themselves serve the purposes of the USA, why to keep the American troops there at high risks?

2007-03-11 10:35:46 · answer #3 · answered by The Falcon 2 · 0 0

i might say it often is the top of the lives of those troops if that few have been there. regardless of one hundred forty,000, they nonetheless can no longer quit the assaults on US troops. "sure, we left greater effective than that for the time of Germany after WW2, is that war nonetheless going?" We have been at war against Germany, no longer some insurgents from many distinctive international places that got here to attack us because of the fact we've been occupying Germany. we are no longer at war against the rustic of Iraq, by no skill have been. The Iraq war isn't such as WWII.

2016-10-01 23:04:48 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yes it will end !! They were not fighting to each other before US attack its now since during last 10 months that they have started fighting each other ! And there is a poltics behind , The dummies are playing in the hands of those politicians who believe in "devide and rule". Neither did Iraq attacked you and they never had such intension, they were invaded for search of MDW which are no where in Iraq !

2007-03-11 10:53:12 · answer #5 · answered by ★Roshni★ 6 · 0 0

We must confront the bizarre logic of saying that the people who have devastated Iraq, who encouraged and enforced sanctions that cost the lives of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis in the last decade, who have failed at even the most basic responsibilities as an occupying power, who are the source of the instability in Iraq today, are the only ones who can protect Iraqis from hunger and anarchy. In no other area of our lives do we accept such logic, but when it comes to the crimes of empire, we are supposed to continually ignore history. The "doctrine of good intentions" exculpates all crimes.

The reality, however, is that the U.S. occupation, rather than being a source of stability in Iraq, is the major source of instability and ongoing suffering.

2007-03-11 10:08:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I was confused by reading your entire statement. I thought at first you were a confused conservative, but now know you are just a liberal.

The war will never end as long as religious fundamentalist are allowed to spew their hatred and destruction throughout the world. This has now become a world war. There will be no nation safe from these maniacs. Got it!

As far as Vietnam goes goes. The liberal's golden child and royal family member was responsible for our involvement in that one. Yes, I'm talking about your beloved JFK and the Kennedy family. I know you libs hate when someone disses your royal family but it's true.

2007-03-11 10:13:20 · answer #7 · answered by bamafannfl 3 · 1 1

No. Iraq's people will continue to be at war with neighboring countries.

2007-03-11 10:14:01 · answer #8 · answered by panthrchic 4 · 0 0

Our participation in Iraq will end when we decide we're done.

We have no single direct opponent, no finish line, nobody setting any goals over there but us. We can declare victory at any point, because we're the only one defining the finish line.

2007-03-11 10:05:30 · answer #9 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0 0

VN is still at war. They were when we arrived, they were while we aere there, and they still are.

What is changed is the lefty media doesn't report it any more. They can sell more papers with newer material- fresh lies.

2007-03-11 10:20:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

You are partly correct.VietNam did not attack us, as they do not have the hate for the west and non Muslims, like the Terrorists do....They have already attacked several times. Given the chance, they will do it again....so your theory hold no water.

2007-03-11 10:07:25 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers