that should be obvious for any right wing holy fool
2007-03-11 09:55:20 · 11 answers · asked by impeachbushnoww 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
LIBERATING IRAQ HAS SAVED LIVES
The link is to a Liberal English newspaper.
It stopped hundreds of thousands of people from dying due to U.N. Santions.
Even by the year 2000, a half of million children died. The real numbers of Saddam related deaths are even higher since Iraq was not liberated until three years later.
2000:
"Half a million children have died in Iraq since UN sanctions were imposed - most enthusiastically by Britain and the US. Three UN officials have resigned in despair. Meanwhile, bombing of Iraq continues almost daily. John Pilger investigates "
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,3605,232986,00.html
2007-03-11 10:00:27 · answer #1 · answered by a bush family member 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Neither. Republicans are giving them the chance to succeed which is what America is all about. If Iraq wants to rise out of the ashes of Saddam and be a just nation then they will have to want it for themselves.
What are democrats doing for Iraq besides blasting our war effort and leaking information to the media about our surveilance programs? After that happened the president shoulda went Abe Lincoln and their asses and locked up all the anti-war politicians that are currently undermining American interests abroad.
2007-03-11 10:26:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The United States isn't killing Iraq, the Iraqi insurgency is what is killing Iraq. We are saving Iraq by fighting those who would rob the people of Iraq of their basic freedom and rights that are guaranteed to all people. It is the nature of man to be free, and any obstacle to that freedom must be removed, so that the people of the country can decide and dictate their own destiny.
2007-03-11 10:00:31 · answer #3 · answered by av8r_jim84 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
americans are satisfied that they have not found any nukes or chemicals. they are unhappy that they had to go. when the international community agree that iraq did not disarm fast enough we will all share in the destruction that has befallen iraq. In the mean time we are looking forward to the continue efferts being made to stableize any threatning escalation. sadam is held responsilbe for this occurence and hes to blame but not held accountable. :)
2007-03-12 05:11:05 · answer #4 · answered by gods creation 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
human beings are killing some Iraqis (occasion association isn't suitable) the unhappy element is we are killing greater Iraqis than Saddam would have and not protecting order there almost besides there's a super contradiction in Bush's rhetoric, on one hand he needs us to have self assurance we are bringing peace and democracy to Iraq, on the different he needs us to have self assurance we are taking the combat to the terrorists (struggling with in Iraq quite than the u . s .), the two he needs war there or he needs peace there, he won't have the ability to have it the two techniques
2016-12-18 11:05:43 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The initial intention was to save them from Sadaam Hussein, and then we opened up a massive can of worms that seems to be getting bigger and bigger by the day, as of now, it is going to take years for that country to stabilize and I dont think that the American people have the patience for that since we should have not been there to begin with..
2007-03-11 10:11:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would Republicans care about what happens to a non- Christian country full of terrorists & their supporters? All they think Iraq is a live shooting gallery for US troops to kill terrorists and/or Iraqi civilians and it doesn't really matter which ones they kill because their all going to hell anyway.
2007-03-11 10:01:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The greatest military power in human history has encountered the limits of its ability to impose its will on a people who do not welcome its intervention.
In Iraq, like Vietnam, soldiers themselves have begun to question the rationale for the war given by politicians and daily echoed by the dominant media.
This is why we are losing.
2007-03-11 10:01:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, by definition, given the number of Iraqis who have died in the past year, killing them is hard to challenge.
The issue is whether killing a few (hundreds of thousands) is justified to save the rest (tens of millions).
2007-03-11 09:58:32 · answer #9 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uhh, Doing Both At The Same Time... (Isn't It Just Nice What Bush Is Doing To Them?)
2007-03-11 10:01:22 · answer #10 · answered by Amrit S. 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋