English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If you call someone FAT it's 'cause they are. If they are SHORT, and so on. The sensitivity, especially when the mock it themselves is rediculous.

2007-03-11 09:50:54 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Cultures & Groups Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender

20 answers

Squeaky wheel, man, squeaky wheel. I'm a "breeder" and was called that by a masculine lesbian when she was upset I turned her down. She was drunk, so I let it slide... (Is it a no-no to say "butch" or "bull-dyke"? I can say it to friends because they know that there's no hatred. From my personality, people tend to mistake me for being bisexual or lesbian... "These shoes just SCREAM bull-dyke, don't they?" for example.)

Some gay male friends and I have used the term to describe an annoying, flaming, jerk of a homosexual male. An embarrassment to humanity, let alone gay culture. Just don't let Rosie O'Donnell hear you or she'll give you a lecture with that "I'm PMS-ing" voice of hers.

Like Ann Coulter said, "I would never want to insult gay people by comparing them to John Edwards" after using the 'f' word.

2007-03-11 10:04:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Polite people follow the rules. If it is PC to call somebody "fat" I haven't been too well informed. You know that it isn't PC to call somebody a "*ag". Any minority has a right, in my opinion, to define the parameters of language concerning their particular difference. "ni**er" and "pa**y" are examples of words that are acceptable within the respective minority community (i.e., its members), but are not PC for the general public. If you define yourself as a homosexual male you may very well use the word "*ag", if you don't the usage is viewed by the gay community as derogatory. The sensitivity to such language is not really an attempt to segregate for exclusivity, but serves as vigilance against hate speach that may lead to violence.

Peace be yours ... let happiness follow.

2007-03-11 10:14:18 · answer #2 · answered by voodooprankster 4 · 1 0

The difference is one of denotative vs. connotative meaning.

A word's denotative meaning is the word's literal meaning, without consideration for the associations that go with it.

A word's connotative meaning, or connotation, includes the implications and associations that come with the use.

For example, effeminate and feminine both have the same basic denotative meaning (qualities associated with women), but very different connotative meanings, with one being mostly neutral and the other derogatory.

"Short" is neutral in connotation. "Fat" can be, but depending on the usage may be a pejorative, especially when used to hurt somebody's feelings.

The word you describe is inappropriate in a way the others are not because it carries with it negative connotations not associated with merely descriptive words.

Do gay men and those they associate with use it? Sure. That's how it works. People who are "in the club" so to speak often use the same language used by outsiders to deman them within their group as a means of robbing it of its power to cause damage, or to reclaim it for much the same reason.

I'm personally not fond of doing this--I generally prefer to call people what they wish to be called--but I do understand the desire to do so.

2007-03-11 10:37:59 · answer #3 · answered by Kate 2 · 1 0

Understand where they are coming from. They already feel outcasted from society as it is. When you here someone say that, it's never in a good way. It is an insult. It's like The "N" word in a sense. It's a degrading term for a group of people. Just be compasionate about it. Im sure you have certain things you don't like to hear. They are no different.

2007-03-11 10:03:03 · answer #4 · answered by MR. B 1 · 1 0

because of the fact it has replace into pg the story traces are lots much less impressive you are able to tell that it's not the comparable the way they carry out and it has replace into very boring and predictable its not approximately undies contests or lesbian storylines or perhaps vulgar promos its virtually greater useful storylines with out regulations and you will definetly tell there are regulations their turning a nicely-liked teach right into a little ones purely teach very almost. fyi im not a cena hater yet he wasn't rather around for the period of the techniques-set era im noticeably beneficial and if he became into he became into purely commencing out interior the corporation and not on precise, and jeff hardy became right into a precise tag group/ mid card wrestler and intensely primary for the period of the techniques-set era inspite of the undeniable fact that he wasn't a precise guy. that became into whilst the rock and austin have been interior the wwe and the precise superstars. BQ: this is a splash disapointing because of the fact i in my view had to work out morrison being pushed and Jericho ought to've given him that push he necessary and would've made a solid feud. Edit: WOW those comments are annoying me, some like the Rock's are authentic those that are asserting that the human beings who cherished the techniques-set era are not authentic followers it particularly is b.s. keep on with ROH in case you pick to easily watch wrestling yet authentic followers of the WWE are followers of the action the storylines the genius Vince McMahon, people who certainly locate it impressive interior the PG era and have self assurance that's greater useful than the techniques-set era with the greats like Austin Undertaker Michaels The Rock and maximum of greater are purely undeniable stupid and not authentic followers in any respect. techniques-set era is what the WWE and Vince McMahon is all approximately.

2016-12-18 11:05:28 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

You see - - - none of these people looked up the word to be sure they use it correctly.
Technically your right.
There is an inference to; f ag - #3 - Brit. 'a young pupil in a British public school required to preform certain menial tasks (teehee) for an older pupil'.

2007-03-11 10:28:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

OK then you start first...dont run back home crying at your mummie after you had your face beaten into a pulp and got f**ked by 10 men in a row....But I guess you are the kind of cowards who make these comments online hiding behind their PC while mummie prepares cookies and milk.
Go out and use the word...I dare you....

2007-03-11 11:40:17 · answer #7 · answered by Nostromo 5 · 0 1

"gay" is so commonly used as a synonym for "bad" or "lame" that I'd actually prefer *ag to replace it. Even my closest friends, who sincerely respect my lifestyle, frequently say something is "gay" instead of saying "oh that sucks". I'm sure they're not even aware of doing it. I'll refer to myself as a *ag, I agree the term is only offensive if you take it as such.

2007-03-11 10:24:28 · answer #8 · answered by lordwashu13 3 · 0 1

uhm... you're asking for a fight. It's called... being PC. Or just decent. Try it sometimes. I don't call people fat or short. So I would never call a gay person that.

2007-03-11 09:55:07 · answer #9 · answered by Ruthie 2 · 1 1

It is not a descriptive word. It is a negative racial slur. It should not be used. However that word is embraced by the community. Just like the N word and black people. I am gay and I will call myself and friends fag all the time. We laugh and laugh. When you are str8, not my friend and call me that I find it offensive. I am sure you don't like racial slurs called to you be people you don't know.

2007-03-11 11:15:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers