Is the Middle East using US troops to bring about "Peace"and "stability" or is there<<<<<<<< ??

Question

a far more surreptious reasoning?
It is clear that Iran and Iraq will be working together to bring about "stability and peace" - or so they say. The US says to Iran: "Stop meddling".
But Iraq and Iran started 'conversing' many months ago. The U.S. had no knowledge of those talks until AFTER they were concluded. Be that as it may,, Iraq does need SOME regional help and apparently they both feel the need for at least some degree of camaraderie being that they are neighbors, despite their past war woes.
We don't OWN the Middle East, leastwise Iraq. Soon, they - Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, even Saudi Arabia will be sharing the same bed.
Something like the U.S. does, with Israel.
And so Iraq feigns the need for the U.S. to remain in Iraq. To root out terrorists, al Quaeda, militias, jihadists, al Sadar loyalists, etc. Saves them the ttrouble.
Of course the Middle East knows our history. They know we take pride in ourselves as the world's 'police' .

So it is a smart move by them –these Iraqis, to USE OUR troops while they meet secretly with others in the region, and come even closer to each other.
Use our troops while they fashion a government to enhance THEMSELVES more than the U.S. Oh, they know they will have to give up at least some portion of their oil interests. But that will be the price. A few billion at a time is merely a drop in the bucket for oil-rich Iraq. They are not so concerned with “security”, given hundreds of their own dying daily. But these are a shrewd, cunning people….They are working for themselves. And they have allies….they are surrounded by them.
And they meet,whenever expedient. Like the U.S, and Israel….
Except that, unlike the U.S. and Israel, they add even more bedfellows,

No, I'm not on their side. But I see it differently than most. I feel we are being used.
.

Bush 'refuses' to leave because he has to save face. He has convinced himslef that we will win this so-called 'war on terror'. But the 'war on terror' will last long after he leaves office.
And no, I do not embrace that the CIA or any other U.S. agency knows everything that is going on re the inbternal workings in Iraq. First, they lie too much. And secondly, US intelligence is sadly lacking in nearly every respect.

....excuse m misspell.
the word is "internal"
not "inbternal"....sorry

Answer 1

The Middle East sees us as meddling, they way of government and leadership is completely differ ant for our system. When we departed from the British rule we did things opposite of them. Just like our driving lanes, current example.
The Middle East ways of forming government are much differ ant their are may powers at play, there. The reason there is no real control in Iraq is because there are to many factions trying to get control, they don't live by a democratic system and they don't want it. They have never wanted it or have ever used it. Our soldiers are helpful in some ways but the longer we stay there that purpose no longer holds any meaning, they are just targets for all the infighting going on in the region.
At one time we were the strongest nation and the worlds police but we are spread to thin and and china is the reason we are still afloat they hold all the u.s notes. Why do you think the markets went nuts a couple of weeks ago. President Bush in putting us at the bottom of the list of powerful nations and will take us a long time to get that back.

Answer 2

It's called Middle East power politics & what really going on is a undeclared civil war between Muslim Sunnis & Muslim Shiites (not just the ones in Iraq but throughout the Mideast) to see who will retain the most influence over that region. The two major players on both sides are Saudi Arabia (Sunnis) & Iran (Shiites). And whoever wins the civil war in Iraq the minority Iraqi Sunnis or the majority Iraqi Shiites will probably decides who will gain or maintain (Sunnis control the Mideast right now) control of the mideast. Bush is playing on both sides of the fence in this civil war between the Sunnis & Shiites because the last thing he wants to see is a massive Mideast regional civil war that would drive gas prices to $10 a gallon, but it could also be a major threat to Israel as well. Bush thinks he has no choice but to keep US troops in Iraq because if he pulls US troops out he thinks all hell will break loose. The only problem is that US troops will have to stay in Iraq forever if he wants to keep the massive Sunni/Shiite Mideast regional civil war from happening.

Answer 3

It depends on what the goals of the US are.

If the goal is to enable Iraq to form a stable government and be democratic, then we need to allow them to do that whatever way they choose. If they choose to ally themselves with Iran, that's their choice. If they choose to elect former terrorists as their leaders, that's their choice. Democracy means accepting the results of the vote, even when you don't agree with them.

On the other hand, if the goal of the US is to ensure that Iraq forms a government we approve of, then democracy has nothing to do with.

As far as "using" our troops -- Bush refuses to leave the country, even when Congress tries to tell him to. So, it's hard to argue that someone else is pulling the strings, when the only reason we are still there is that Bush refuses to leave.

Answer 4

There is no "stability and peace" possible in Iraq as long as Islam rules. The Shiites and the Sunnis will continue to fight each other. Democracy is not even a remote possibility. George W. is there for one reason...oil. All of his rhetoric is meaningless claptrap. The American people have been duped.

Answer 5

You don't think that the CIA and the USA's military are aware of this?? Believe me, they know much more than you do, and I have no doubt that they know exactly what their (Iran and Iraq) next move is, and we have a plan for it. Seriously, so many people think they have a "heads up" on some situation and that our government lacks the knowledge. Ridiculous!

Answer 6

It depends what Iraq's intentions toward Iran are. Iraq has a strong Sunni influence so I doubt any meaningful relationship will occur.

If we a superpower dont fight tyranny, who is going to?

Answer 7

renowned food? - Fries <3 renowned shade? - Blue renowned sort of icecream? - strawberry renowned tpye of cookie? - chocolate chip renowned drink? - water renowned animal? - Fish renowned letter? - S renowned extensive form? - 2 do you have a pool? - No do you have a puppy? - No what sort? - i dont have a puppy whats his/her call? - no puppy what shade is your room? - yellow whats your initials? - SB is this dull? - Kinda do you like oreos? - luv em whats your renowned sort of snack? - chocolate :p whats your renowned fruit? - bananass vegetable? - carrots do you savor ingesting pasta? - yup what's your renowned sport? - swimming did you graduate extreme college? - No if so, what twelve months? i will graduate 2010 supply me a link to something you opt for: mm can no longer think of of one Why could desire to i %. you as perfect answer? because of the fact i'm eye-catching