English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Was that Clinton's way of helping our men and women who serve?

2007-03-11 08:57:50 · 12 answers · asked by duck 2 in Politics & Government Politics

12 answers

you are right clinton was bad.

BUT BUSH DID AN EXCELLENT JOB.

thats why the general got fired and fed up "men and women who serve" our country spoke out against, showed the true colors of Bush's leadership abilities.

you are right, BUSH DID AN EXCELLENT JOB, NOT!!!!!!!

2007-03-11 09:02:29 · answer #1 · answered by PROUD TO BE A LIBERAL TEEN! 4 · 1 3

Hrere are the Facts Carter and reagon cut VA spending because of econoimics Clinton did also Bush increased spending 115% Obama has increased spending also. So lets get the fact correct.

2014-04-24 05:36:58 · answer #2 · answered by Ceasefire49 2 · 0 0

the army medical device has no longer something to do with a wounded squaddies payroll. Walter Reed replaced into scheduled to be closed and all events transferred to Bethesda Naval medical institution. They did limited maintenance previous to 2005 via planned circulate of events. the dept of protection then replaced their concepts. No-doubt from particular hobbies that that had to maintain Reed open. This has thrown chaos into the device. the generic i've got faith, replaced into made a scapegoat for government indecision, waste and mismanagement. in spite of everything that's an indictment of "socialized" well being care.

2016-10-01 23:01:33 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

You mean 10 years ago, when the number of troops was different, and the number of people at the hospitals was different, and the costs of operations were different?

And, are you forgetting that Bush has been in charge for the past six years?

So, your argument seems to be that because Clinton cut funding 10 years ago, Bush never had a chance to do anything about it despite being in charge for more than half of that time. Seems pretty careless and inefficient of the current administration, if they can't even figure out what they need to pay for.

2007-03-11 09:02:31 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2 2

It was cut during Billy Boy's administration. But, it was Hilliary's Health Care reform that congress acted on.

Once a budget is cut by congress its hard to build it back up again. That's why any organization getting government budget will go out at the end of the year and buy useless crap. If they don't use all this years budget they get cut and can't get it back.

2007-03-11 09:20:23 · answer #5 · answered by Gunny Bill 3 · 0 0

Clinton deployed the military for meals on wheels duty something like 43 times. Clinton loathed the military remember?

2007-03-11 09:14:34 · answer #6 · answered by archangel72901 4 · 0 0

As much as I want to agree with you, the President has little to do in this. Congress sets the Budgets. Congress wants to close this facility. Congress cut the budget. I hate the libs as well and Big Bill was a piece of dung, he is off the hook on this one as is GW BUSH.

2007-03-11 09:05:27 · answer #7 · answered by THOR! 1 · 1 0

Hate to disappoint you but Reagan was the one that cut Vetereans benefits and spending for hospitals.....

2007-03-11 11:21:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Err, uuuhh, President Clinton wasn't sending hundreds of thousands of Americans off to be maimed and killed in a quagmire and didn't see the need.

2007-03-11 09:04:14 · answer #9 · answered by ideogenetic 7 · 3 2

So Bush could let things get worse diuring his War on Terror and let rats climb around soldiers who came back from fighting the unjust war in Iraq.

2007-03-11 09:01:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers