English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What exactly is it that conservatives don't like about public education? The idea that everybody gets one? The idea that school boards are democratically elected? What?

2007-03-11 08:19:04 · 20 answers · asked by Longhaired Freaky Person 4 in Politics & Government Politics

20 answers

the fact that kids are graduating and cannot even read? That teachers have to be forced to know more than the kids they are teaching? Gee ....tell me what you think is so right about it?

2007-03-11 08:22:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

I cannot speak for all Conservatives. But I am not opposed to public education.

I am opposed to the way it has been going these past 30 odd years.

It is the classroom I have a problem with, and school boards do not spend any time there.

My son attended public education, until one month ago. I have been highly visible and very involved, as a parent. I have been a member of the PTA and attended every meeting, and am currently involved in suing the former Principal for theft, from the PTA.

2007-03-11 08:23:43 · answer #2 · answered by Shrink 5 · 3 1

I am a conservative, and support the concept of public schools. Currently I attend a public High School (because there are no private schools in our town that would even qualify as mediocre, compared to the public schools.) However, I believe that the system is far behind, so I hire tutors to teach me more advanced aspects of academic subjects.

2007-03-11 08:32:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Free education should end at the 5th grade .
Then based on income schools charge 3% for educational purposes . $30.00 per thousand of income to continue on with the classical education . The rest after fifth grade who;s parents will not pay this fee their kids go to trade school to learn wood ,metal, auto ,nursing, and all the services . By the time they are 18 they are prepared to go to work . SOme sooner . Those places of employment are presented the cost of education and are offered credits for free services provided to the poor and elderly to offset the costs incured or offer a true free benefit to society .
No longer should teachers unions ,lawyers and the like profit from the system that fails to educate 30% of the students and have graduated 100's of thousands who can not function in society at all because the can not fill out the application at McDonalds Read a bus schedule or follow the directions on a bottle of asprin .

If kids want a classical education they can read books about it anytime they want .
Teachers who can not get kids to read and write and do math at a fifth grade level should be removed from teaching and all benefits taken away .

2007-03-11 08:30:05 · answer #4 · answered by trouble maker 3 · 2 2

My main gripes with public education are these:

1) Lack of discipline. The public schools have deteriorated precipitously since corporal punishment was banned.

2) Lack of proper focus. I don't particularly care about Junior's self-esteem issues. Teach him to add and subtract and his self-esteem will follow naturally.

3) Self-absorbed teachers. The NEA and the AFT are far more interested in ensuring that teachers won't ever be held responsible for failing to teach than they are in serving the children.

4) Automatic promotion. There should be a list of goals and objectives to be met at each grade llevel. I don't care if he's 22, if Junior hasn't mastered long division, he stays in the 4th grade.

2007-03-11 08:26:56 · answer #5 · answered by Rick N 5 · 3 0

Most conservatives send their children to public schools, some to private schools. Those who can afford private schools do so many times for religious, social or cultural reasons. It isn't only the rich or the conservatives who do this, many immigrant or religious affiliations use other than public educational services.

The belly of the beast keeps getting bigger and bigger in the US. As it grows, violence and diversity in schools grows, too. Many people do not wish to expose their children to this social/ economic and sometimes violent travesty, therefore they use the other options available to them; private schooling being the most appealing.

2007-03-11 08:29:46 · answer #6 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 0 0

They are not necessarily opposed to public education per se.

They simply would argue that, generally speaking, the state is a poor provider of education compared with the private sector.

They also believe that if someone wishes to spend money educating ther children whey should be encouraged to do so.

There are also problems with having too much governmental dominance in our education systems. The state discourages variety, independence of thought and specialisation. State systems are too large to be flexible and tend to produce mediocrity and homogenisation.

2007-03-11 08:28:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

definite, definite, possibly. i will do a bigger job of dealing with my retirement funds than the government can. SSI is in basic terms no longer around for my era even regardless of the undeniable fact that I even have paid into the gadget for over 25 years. Our public colleges are properly at the back of colleges in different areas of the international. in case you will get the government to end investment colleges and return the tax funds it is at the instant spent on training to the tax payers then shall we take care of to pay for private colleges. private colleges right here interior the U. S. do a notably solid job in evaluation to public colleges. Medicare could be shrink if we allowed those elderly already on it to proceed to apply it yet did no longer enable new individuals to be added on. Medi & Medi is in shambles in basic terms like all different government run software.

2017-01-04 07:32:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Only when it is not accountable to parents|

That is often the case|


For example, the Toronto school board introduced a program which teaches that homosexuality is right and is a legitimate alternative lifestyle|

But at the same time, they deny parents the right to have their kids opt out of that if the parents object on moral grounds| All students are forced to attend those classes|



---

2007-03-11 08:45:54 · answer #9 · answered by Catholic Philosopher 6 · 2 1

I went to public school, my kids went to public school and my grandchildren are going to public school.

Wealthy conservatives and liberals send their kids to private schools.

Some problems with public schools are: that kids of illegal immigrants over pack the classroom.

English is the accepted language here. Don't waste my tax dollars buying books in Spanish or hiring English as Second Language teachers. Make the kids learn ENGLISH!

The kids run the schools in some locations and the administration has it hands tied by liberals. If a kid is punished then the school is guilty of child abuse.

2007-03-11 08:40:33 · answer #10 · answered by Gunny Bill 3 · 1 2

You seem to be getting your facts confused. But this isn't the first time you've heard that, now, is it!

Conservatives are not opposed to "public" education. They are opposed to "poor quality" education.

I know it is hard to understand, but there is a difference!

2007-03-11 08:27:03 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers