English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

and to congress?

and do you think Larry Silverstein cut Bush in on a chunk of the insurance money?

2007-03-11 08:04:03 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

23 answers

They [King George II and his royal advisors: Lords Cheney, Rumsfeld, Feith, Wolfowitz, Gonzalez, and Lady Rice] have refused their Assent to Laws and Policies, most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

They have engaged in acts of ethnic cleansing and genocide in the city of New Orleans through acts of criminal neglect and gross mismanagement of the aftermath of a natural disaster, the willful creation of a diaspora of the poor Black inhabitants of New Orleans, the suspension of labor laws which would have ensured fair wages to those rebuilding the city, and the dispensation of generous federal contracts to crony corporations to rebuild a city favorable to the interests of the wealthy.

They manipulated facts and presented lies to the American People and to Congress to gain necessary approval of a "preventive", illegal war against the sovereign nation of Iraq on the shifting premises that this nation posed an immediate threat to our national security, that the Iraqi people needed a champion to topple a ruthless dictator, and that their purpose was to spread "freedom and liberty". It has now come to light that Iraq possessed no weapons of mass destruction, had no connections with Osama bin Laden, and was little or no threat to the United States. They knew this prior to the invasion. They subverted a government led by a former US ally whom the US supported when it knew he was committing genocide. They installed a puppet Iraqi regime fortified by 140,000 US military personnel and call it "Democracy". They are responsible for the deaths of over 100,000 Iraqi civilians. Their hands drip with the blood of innocents slaughtered using monies from our Treasury and the blood, sweat and tears of our children.

They recruited and trained US military personnel under the pretext that they would be engaged in defending their nation. After enticing young men and women to serve based on blatant lies, They thrust them into imperial conquests like the one in Iraq. They are responsible for the sacrifice of over 3,000 American lives which They sacrificed at their sacred alter of the almighty Dollar.

2007-03-11 08:06:18 · answer #1 · answered by dstr 6 · 6 6

There are only three documented cases of Bush providing false information to Congress -- regarding his signing statements, regarding treatment of detainees, and regarding NSA activity.

Lying to the American people is reprehensible, but not a violation of his oath of office. Disregarding the Constitution is a violation of his oath of office, and there are about six hundred documented cases, as well as numerous suspected cases. Only two have been confirmed by the US Supreme Court.

2007-03-11 08:44:13 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0 1

Virtually in every way possible. I'm not sure whether Dictator Dumbya is a WTC attack perp. The evidence for such a charge should be as extraordinary as the charge itself, but there are a LOT of questions that need answers. And if somebody followed the money, (and lived to tell about it), I bet it would end up with a LOT of Dumbya offshore numbered accounts.

2007-03-11 08:39:40 · answer #3 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 0 1

each and anytime he has signed unconstitutional costs into regulation. featuring any funds merchandise featuring welfare, medicare, funds for training, social protection, company welfare, agricultural welfare, campaign finance reform, etc, etc. yet, in line with that, each president and each and each legislator of the previous century has violated their oath of place of work, too. They understand a number of those issues are in finished contradiction to the principles that underlay the structure, besides the undeniable fact that it get them elected. The judiciary are not any more suitable positive. human beings enable this take position because they are more suitable in contact contained in the "bread & circuses" they can get from the politicians than contained in the freedoms, liberties and rights that once were our birthright.

2016-12-01 20:22:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Dear Brenda Lisa Katrina Ginger Cory Susan Nancy,

Zero,none,zip, zilch,nil,0,.

2007-03-11 08:14:55 · answer #5 · answered by Mother 6 · 4 3

Not as much as you violate the polices of Yahoo answers by having many accounts and spamming.

2007-03-11 08:33:01 · answer #6 · answered by ohbrother 7 · 3 0

Asked and answered Nancy.

But I see you are using your Brenda screen name at the moment. My mistake.

You did well with Susie Q yesterday!

When are you going to bring back Bob and Crypto Jew Girl. I am really starting to miss them.

2007-03-11 08:17:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

According to Willie Wonka, when you appear before the jury, your statements mean anything you want them to mean ( it depends upon what your definition of IS is ).

Using that as a precedent, BUSH has never lied and neither has Mrs Willie, Jo-Jo Murtha or any member of Congress.

It is no longer anything that has meaning. Clinton killed it.

2007-03-11 08:13:51 · answer #8 · answered by Mr. Been there 4 · 4 2

Sorry Nancy but he hasn't. How many times are you going to lie to Yahoo answer users? Thankfully no one takes you seriously anyway.

2007-03-11 08:18:32 · answer #9 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 3 1

Too many not to be impeached! Come on Nancy lets get the ball rolling here!!!!

2007-03-11 08:17:14 · answer #10 · answered by meldorhan 4 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers