English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

At least 3 Former FBI agents/translator have information contradicting the official story, but they have gag orders placed on them. Why?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Wright%2C_Jr.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sibel_Edmonds
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coleen_Rowley

On 08/06/2001 President Bush received this PDB titled "Bin Laden determined to strike in US". How come the Bush Admin. claimed for the longest time to have no foreknowledge of the events?
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/10/august6.memo/

The families of the victims of 9/11 gave questions to the 9/11 commision in order to get the answers they sought. However, only 30% of the questions were answered to the satisfaction of the families. Why?
http://www.911pressfortruth.com/families

Now i know i have triggered some of you guys to "shoot" out "conspiracy nut" etc. But think for a second, these are indisputable facts and it only shows that we have more questions than answers about what really happened that day.

2007-03-11 08:03:33 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

8 answers

Ppl are so blind. The american public has been deceived, and lied to for so long that when the truth is put in front of them they wouldn't know it. America has built a reputation for scandals and cover-ups it's the american way. I think it was all a ploy to go after Saddam to get the oil before Saddam let Euros be the official coin to purchase oil instead of the american dollar. Why haven't we heard about any efforts to go after Osama and don't say he's dead. Propaganda is killing the american society. We believe what we shouldn't and don't believe what we should. The only ppl who disbelieve the facts are the supporters of w and his wicked regime. I have no loyalty to any political party for what?, when behind closed doors they support each others agendas. 911 was probably no accident when truth be told we never went after the one who was the culprit behind it all. Why would w go after him when Osamas family backed the elder bush and many of his administration during the reagan years. Ppl are just so stupid. It will be too late when they realize w don't care ne thing about them, he loves them to death now so they can keep bickering with the demorats over nothing while he continues to destroy america and her ppl.

2007-03-11 08:42:47 · answer #1 · answered by DFatOne 4 · 1 1

All you have to do to know that 9/11 was not an inside conspiracy is to see President Bush's face on the tape when he was told of the news. I was watching CNBC right after the first but before the second plane hit. They cut away to him in school. If as what you libtards say is true that Dubya is dumb then he would not have been capable of "acting" surprised. Go look at those tapes again.

You can't have it both ways: he either was :

#1: in the conspiracy and dumb, hence couldn't "pretend" to be shocked - disagrees with body language and reactions - IMPOSSIBLE
#2: In the conspiracy, not dumb, and acting - body language and reactions do not agree - IMPOSSIBLE
#3: not acting and NO conspiracy POSSIBLE
#4: not in the conspiracy and not acting POSSIBLE
#5: Acting but no conspiracy IMPROBABLE AND TO WHAT END?

So the only area up to debate is #4 - So if he's not in the conspiracy, who is the head? Rumsfeld? Chaney? Papa? Do you think they could leave him out of the loop without his finding out? Do you think they'd want to leave him out of the loop? Do you seriously think a conspiracy could unfold without him having been aware of it before hand, even if it was done against his will in a kind of blackmail by terrorists? If so his body language and facial expressions betray total shock, not inside knowledge - therefore IMPOSSIBLE.

So #3 wins by default. Time to get a reality check.

2007-03-11 14:08:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Yes, it was all a plot by Bush for an excuse to invade Iraq, and get their oil for his business friends. If you think wikipedia is a legitimate source you should consider their source.

2007-03-11 08:09:22 · answer #3 · answered by lestermount 7 · 2 0

The whole thing is a scam. It always bothered me that Bush finished his goat book before he asked where, when and how after he was told we were under attack. Is it because he already knew the answers?

2007-03-11 08:15:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

After any national disaster, there are always "conspiracy theories" and "real evidence" to back them up.

This is just another one...

Educated people with half a brain recognize this and don't buy into these half-baked ideas.

2007-03-11 11:48:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Yes it is mind boggling, it makes anyone of clear thought wonder what is going on.

2007-03-11 08:12:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Yes these links are mind boggling, which explains why your mind is boggled. Do you believe everything put on the web is true?
How sad if you do.

2007-03-11 08:15:05 · answer #7 · answered by Lt. Dan reborn 5 · 2 3

They are NOT "indisputable (not UNdisputable) aspects."

2007-03-11 08:16:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers