English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What's worse, having a cigarette but not having a light, or being in a place that's "No Smoking"?

2007-03-11 07:42:17 · 22 answers · asked by Veruca Salt 6 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

22 answers

I'd say having a cigarette but not having a light. It creates more deperation in me. I have pulled off the highway and taken my car apart looking for anything to light up a cigarette right then and there. But when I'm in a place thats "no smoking" I'm more like F' you and I go outside and spark it up - unless i don't have a light, and then I walk blocks and blocks and accost every stranger along the way to light it. So yea the light is important.

2007-03-11 07:46:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I would have to say as an X smoker having a cigarette but not having a light. If your in a place thats no smoking you always have the option of your car.

2007-03-11 14:44:58 · answer #2 · answered by caddie_manjd 4 · 0 0

I quit over a year ago however when I did smoke I would carry two lighters in case one failed. I would walk for a long way to find a area where I could smoke, like miles sometimes.

2007-03-11 15:33:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

For me it would be not having a light. I can always leave the no smoking place.

2007-03-11 14:57:56 · answer #4 · answered by 4kids2pay4 7 · 0 0

I think being in a non smoking area is worse, cause you can always find a lighter somewhere, but you can't change the no smoking area.

2007-03-11 14:54:24 · answer #5 · answered by TWT 6 · 0 0

being in a no smoking place.. why should they get to tell us we can't smoke? besides if we didn't have a ligjht we could go around and ask ppl for one and esp if it did allow smoking

bti of a hard decision b/c not having a light is so frustrating.

2007-03-11 14:53:20 · answer #6 · answered by xogingerox 3 · 0 0

No smoking is worse. You can bum a light off of someone.

2007-03-11 14:47:35 · answer #7 · answered by soulestada 4 · 0 0

A place that's no smoking. I think...

2007-03-11 14:46:38 · answer #8 · answered by Taylor 2 · 0 0

hmm.....having a cigarette and no lighter..if a place is no smoking I can go outside....

2007-03-11 14:49:11 · answer #9 · answered by INSANE SUGARPUFF 6 · 0 0

IT IS BETTER TO SMOKE ..I KNOW THAT FOR A FACT ..A DOCTOR ONCE TOLD THAT TO MY NEIGHBOR CAUSE SHE HAS BAD LUNGS AND THEY SAID BETWEEN HER HUSBANDS SECOND HAND SMOKING AND HER GETTING SECOND HAND SMOKE FROM BINGO ..THAT SHE IS BETTER OFF TO SMOKE A CIGARETTE

2007-03-11 16:09:04 · answer #10 · answered by Swm 39 4 Younger Swf Forever 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers