Didn't know but it wouldn't surprise me.
btw how you keeping?
2007-03-11 07:30:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Blessed 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ethanol is not really viable as a "fuel of the future" because it costs as much (if not more) to produce as ordinary gasoline for the same amount of energy obtained from it. It's just a way of funneling money to the states that produce corn, which are (of course) "red states".
2007-03-11 14:29:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by HalJor 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush also has a green house more than Gore.
Gore is pushing a company to make him 'carbon netural'
he is also the CEO of it.
Yep global warming is all about making a buck now.
2007-03-11 14:28:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Never been to Houston, TX have you? Never studied much in school either I'd say.
2007-03-11 14:27:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Metroguy 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I thought all you cared about way being carbon neutral?
2007-03-11 14:29:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Josh 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No i didn't and since the info came from you I still don't know it.
2007-03-11 14:29:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by archangel72901 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
hmmmmm, i am still sane, i think i am going to get off of answers while such is still the case
2007-03-11 14:28:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You mean 'Corn' cartel right?
2007-03-11 14:28:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by occluderx 4
·
0⤊
0⤋