a prima donna.
2007-03-11 07:21:44 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
drew led the league nfc in receptions in 74 and 77
2007-03-11 07:34:01 · update #1
he needs to be he was one of the first dominant wide outs he could catch was a desent speed and could block
ps to prove he could block look at tony dorsets 99yard touch down run
2007-03-11 13:36:21 · answer #1 · answered by sean O 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
easy answer:
LYNN SWANN DOES NOT BELONG IN THE HALL OF FAME
Only played 9 seasons, and only managed to top 800 yards in 2 of those 9 seasons, and never got as high as 900, much less a 1000 yard season, which was always the benchmark, even during his playing days. His first and last seasons, he barely dotted the playing field on offense, combining for 29 catches in 20 games, less than 500 yds (combined) and a mere 2 TD's.
2007-03-11 14:24:31 · answer #2 · answered by d b 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The difference between the two, that keeps Pearson out, sad as it may be, is Drew's tendency to disappear in the post-season. I think that's unfair to Drew, seeing how he was consistantly near the top of the NFC, but that's how the voters work.
2007-03-11 23:29:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Drew Pearson definately deserves to be an HOFer! But, so does Lynn Swann. Let Drew's perfomance speak for itself, instead of putting another player down.
2007-03-11 14:32:54 · answer #4 · answered by Chris L 1 · 3⤊ 1⤋
There is more to the Hall then just Stats. Swann didn't go in because of his Stats. He went in for who he was.
2007-03-11 15:22:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
it is clear that there is a cowboy bias in the hall of fame, there is no doubt pearson belongs, one of the best wide outs of the 70's
2007-03-11 14:32:43 · answer #6 · answered by barnone1776 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
you forget swann has 4 super bowl rings and was super bowl 10s' mvp.
2007-03-11 15:14:17 · answer #7 · answered by The New England Patriot 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
it may be true but before any other wide receiver gets inducted the HOF voters MUST vote in art monk...it's shameful that he's not in
2007-03-11 14:25:40 · answer #8 · answered by sabes99 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well i think so
2007-03-11 14:28:39 · answer #9 · answered by john s 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋