Is science a threat to religious belief?

Question

I personally do not believe it is. People will always hold on to that which gives meaning to their lives.

Technology and medicine brings benefits to everyone including the religious who fear knowledge may disprove belief.

Answer 1

"Our two minds .... One is an act of the emotional
mind, the other of the rational mind. In a very real
sense we have two minds, one that thinks and one that
feels" (Daniel Goleman, Emotional Intelligence,
Bloomsbury Publishing, London, 1996, page 8). This
rational mind is also called the faculty of logic and
reason.

The Upanishads call theemotional mind as Chitta and
the rational mind as Manas. Chitta is connected with
religious belief and Manas is connected with science.
The Upanishads say that these two are opposite in
nature. Modern psychologists have also observed it,
but they are not very sure of it.

"At the same time, reason sometimes clearly seems to
come into conflict with some desires (even while not
being in conflict with others) giving us the impression
that reason is separate from emotion".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reason

Many religious persons are called unreasonable and
most of the scientists are called un-intuitional. However,
logic and reason has its own limitation:

In the 1930s, Austrian mathematician Godel proved a
theorem which became the "Godel theorem" in cognition
theory. It states that any formalized 'logical' system
in principle cannot be complete in itself. It means
that a statement can always be found that can be
neither disproved nor proved using the means of that
particular system. To discuss about such a statement,
one must go beyond that very logic system; otherwise
nothing but a vicious circle will result. Psychologist
say that any experience is contingent - it's opposite
is logically possible and hence should not be treated
as contradictory.

Science and religion co-exist like the two poles of
a magnet - they can not be separated.

Answer 2

The answer is the reverse. Religions have always attacked science and scientists. For centuries the Christian church held that earth was the center piece of the universe and everything revolved around this tiny planet. Any scientist that wrote or stated that the dogma was untrue was called before an ecclesiastical court and condemned to everything from imprisonment to burning at the stake or hanging if they didn't recant.

This attitude within the Christian church still exists.

Answer 3

science can help reinforce some religious beliefs. though it may not show what 'god' is, it may show how god works. it also may show that a god of christian belief does not exist, and instead life is just something else.

you cant pick and choose what it will reveal.

though any form of religion or science is limited to the users abilities. since life is far more complex than us, I dont ever see us udnerstanding anything concrete about it. we humans attempt to make everything fit into our equations and dreams, but life is mush more than that, and I say that no one can believe the truth to life, because it is far beyond our limited abilities to comprehend. even science if flawed with that limitation. it would be like a 1 yr old child trying to comprehend written text. they can see it, but they dont even realise what they are looking at.

so the truth may be right in front of us, but we lack the ability to know it is.

so beliefs are essentially flawed by us trying to streamline them to suit us, and so is science. even though we have been accurate in m any things, these things are only because they are the more obvious actions of reality.

just enjoy the ride, and rely less of proofs.

Answer 4

Science is considered a threat to religious belief only by small, close-minded people who don't want to think for themselves.

Some religious leaders encourage this mindset because they want to keep their flocks in check and unable to think for themselves. What do you think God gave us minds for?

I believe that science will never prove or disprove the existence of God, but it doesn't need to. Proof of His existence is all around us in the wonder and beauty of nature and within each of us. You're not denying God if you acknowledge and embrace the marvels of science; you're only celebrating some of His many wonderful works.

Answer 5

Yes. You can not argee that science exists and still cling to some old made up belifse. Science is what we have observed about the waorl and how it works. Religion was just made up by some loons in a cave long, long ago.

The biggest problem with religion is that it's can't be wrong.

Answer 6

It isn't a threat in my religion--wiccan. I believe that if you look to hundreds of years ago, those who would consider themselves scientists now would have been called Witches then.. So really science has roots in people who were known as witches at one time. We all strive to know and understand the world around us and use it to help our fellow man and the planet. That is why the fundies are so frightened of science and of pagans. Knowledge is power.

Answer 7

I personally don't think it is. To some extent i think religion can be seen as a threat to science- everything which is discovered in science has theory behind it all and therefore can be explained by a person- religion is something which is bigger-it not only provides a sense of direction but gives you answers the ongoings on the world.

Answer 8

technology hasn't carried out something to threaten faith. different than possibly open peoples minds to provide up accepting the bibles teachings so actually. the element maximum folk do no longer comprehend is that the bible grew to become into printed to guy 2000+ years in the past. the earliest revelations have been lots extra beneficial than 2000 years previous. the human recommendations grew to become into lots under-more desirable than that's now. so needless to say issues that we nevertheless won't be able to appreciate in the present day might might desire to be dumbed down so primitive guy ought to a minimum of understand the basics. technology in straight forward terms famous issues to us that have been defined in a distinctive way back then because of the fact they did no longer have the technology now we've. there remains quite some issues that technology hasn't defined. issues that have been defined interior the bible, yet they have been defined metaphorically or by way of legend/parable. quickly sufficient we are able to have logical motives for each thing. yet we can't in any respect coach nor disprove gods existence. it purely isn't satisfactory.

Answer 9

i dont think we will ever know all the answers. as long as that is true religion will always be here. and how are we to truely know what has happened in the past. adam and eve vs. the big bang. no one was here to record the earth's begining so what do you believe, the bible or scientist. either option is based on faith, so doesn't that make both of them religion to som extent.

Answer 10

For me, science is the equivalent of religion. Science is the method used to put us here. I've never understood why most religions don't embrace the scientific method as proof of god's work.