2007-03-11 07:15:56 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If babies could vote would it be an issue?
2007-03-11 07:19:34 · answer #1 · answered by howard h 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yep it easily could be, women individuals could then be those affirming abortion became terrible. sure it may nonetheless be an argument, because you do not could be a preacher, or maybe religious to understand that in society right this moment abortion shouldn't exist. Condoms, birth control pills, and a million different ideas exist to stay away from theory, plus they actually have a morning after pill, if you happen to use alcohol as an excuse. the in reality those which could have any rationalization for abortion could be rape victims, except that its an out of date theory that abortion could be a suitable. women individuals now have the right to decline, a suitable that wasn't concrete clean again even as that judgment became made, they have a suitable to apply assorted birth control, (the guy too) they have the right to take a morning after pill even. The abortion theory is out of date in all besides the undeniable fact that the most severe circumstances.
2016-12-01 20:19:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We all know the answer to that one - HELL no. They'd be lining up around the block at abortionist's offices. My husband acts like he's got ebola when he has the sniffles. They could never handle the rigors of pregnancy or the main responsibility of raising children when the woman took a powder because she got "trapped." This gave me a smile just imagining the men I know sweating bullets while waiting for the pregnancy test to show positive or negative.
2007-03-11 07:41:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
We would be in the same place, because all that is happening is that the gender roles are reversing. Nothing would change.
Unless of course, everything immediately swapped, and everyone remembered the old way. But... who cares? It's idle speculation.
2007-03-11 07:26:42 · answer #4 · answered by K 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. If the only women having abortions were rape and incest victims, would abortion even be an issue?
2007-03-11 07:24:07 · answer #5 · answered by Shrink 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You don't just "get" pregnant. You have to do something first. You have all the choice in the world not to do what makes you pregnant.
2007-03-11 07:19:34 · answer #6 · answered by Delphi 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Of course it would. There are just as many self-centered men who would be more than happy to kill their unborn child for the sake of convenience as there are women who do so today.
Save your breath regarding rape & incest, as we both kow that's a red herring which accounts for a tiny precentage of abortions. Let's discuss the remaining 99.5%, shall we?
2007-03-11 07:21:06 · answer #7 · answered by Rick N 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
It would probably be called murder instead of the antiseptic term abortion in that case.
2007-03-11 07:27:29 · answer #8 · answered by archangel72901 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
If men got pregnant we would keep it in our pants.
2007-03-11 07:25:10 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
If men had to carry, then give birth, the human race would be over in a few decades. All it would take is the one man who did it, he would get himself fixed, then spread the word to others, the pain and agony of birth, then boom......... extinction.
2007-03-11 07:25:24 · answer #10 · answered by FireBug 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋