With plain HTML you get complete control over the code - so you can optimize the code to the best possible extent.
Using a tool like dreamweaver you can still get your website done - and that too more easily. Its also easier to manage the entire site more easily. The only downside is the unwanted code that dreamweaver may add.
However - if you generate webpages in dreamweaver, the code can still be edited manually so that the code is made optimal. This way you can have best of both the worlds.
2007-03-19 06:35:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by r_ranjith 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Writing the HTML yourself gives you total control over your site. Also, if there are some cross-browser compatability problems or some other bug, Dreamweaver isn't going to help you. You'll have to rev up Notepad and look at the code. One other thing is writing the HTML yourself saves you from having the rest of the additional garbage a WYSIWYG editor may or may not toss into your page (MS FrontPage does this). The best of both worlds, IMO, is to use WYSIWYG for general layout of content and links, and HTML by hand for the rest of it.
2007-03-11 08:16:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
HTML:
1. You know EXACTLY the code you typed and how everything functions.
2. You get really good with html and it helps you when you go on to bigger websites.
DREAMWEAVER:
1. It does a lot of the work for you. (Set's styles, closes tags, gives you hints if you do decide to plain code). Consequently, you don't learn as much but your site looks better.
2. Easy updates to websites.
3. Easy file linking. For example, most links on your website are internal. With Dreamweaver, it managers links for you. So, if you move a file, all references to that file ANYWHERE within your site automatically change if you change within Dreamweaver. This saves you a TON of time.
4. It helps you organize your site into contents very easily.
5. You can design, maintain, update, post live and everything else website related right on Dreamweaver.
6. Dreamweaver doesn't write excessive code for html. Other programs do, so you won't know EXACTLY what your code does.
ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE:
TIME ... html hand coding is much slower. Dreamweaver, much faster!
2007-03-11 07:56:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by xdwcpsd 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
What you're bearing on are WYSIWYG (What you spot is what you get) editors like Frontpage, Dreamweaver, writer, etc.. i think there are various explanation why human beings do no longer use courses like those, yet i will purely communicate for myself so i will provide you 2 huge explanation why i in my opinion do no longer use them: a million. as quickly as I found out to enhance web pages, there become no such element as a WYSIWYG. So I found out what i mandatory to verify with the intention to do what i needed to do. Now that i will examine and write HTML, Hypertext Preprocessor, CSS, and on and on fluently i discover that spending the time getting to grasp the thank you to apply yet another gadget that does what I already be attentive to the thank you to do is pointless. 2. only for the reason which you're no longer staring on the code in the WYSIWYG editor, would not advise it would not exist. The code is only being produced via a bite of application, particularly than written out via a developer. this would, and likely will, produce invalid code via W3C standards. the reason being with the help of the fact the piece of application isn't smart sufficient to be attentive to this is doing something incorrect, this is only doing what this is informed to do. It additionally can not shop up with internet standards, as they seem to alter extra without postpone than a clean version of application would properly be written, packaged, and resold. the end results of invalid code is a internet site that would not seem as anticipated in all internet browsers, leaving a dressmaker thinking why his/her internet site would not appear as if they anticipated it would... and without the understanding to repair it.
2016-11-24 20:31:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
HTML is a language designed to describe the semantics and structure of a document, not its appearance. WYSIWYG is all about the appearance and thus isn't very good at getting the semantics and structure correct.
2007-03-11 06:51:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by David D 7
·
0⤊
0⤋