English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

Google it

2007-03-11 07:40:56 · answer #1 · answered by JustTheD 2 · 0 1

I'll do one direction for you. Suppose X is separable, and we have a countable dense subset T. Now take the set T' of normalized vectors in T-{0}. We claim that T' is a dense subset of S(X) also.

Indeed, let e>0 and x in S(X). Then the open ball U(x, e) in X contains an element y of T: i.e. || y - x || < e. Let y' be the normalization of y. This gives:

|| y' - x || <= || y' - y || + || y - x || < || y' - y || + e.

Now, || y' - y || = || y' - ||y|| * y' || = | 1 - ||y|| | = | ||x|| - ||y|| | < e.

So the above inequality < 2e, and U'(x, 2e) must contain an element of T'.

2007-03-12 03:40:53 · answer #2 · answered by limsup75 2 · 0 0

sell for the Vocals purchase for the Songwriting permit's evaluate the super songs from each set we ought to? X ingredient & digital X The Angel And The Gambler Futureal sign Of The go guy on the edge the edge of Darkness Lord Of The Flies The Clansman worry and No Prayer Tailgunner worry Of The darkish Run Silent Run Deep From right here To Eternity Seven super songs as against 4, yet there is the counterbalance, Blaze Bayley's god undesirable hoarse tin halfass Bruce impersonation. So it somewhat comes out approximately even MA2: Hell I desire they had redo the good songs with Bruce for an EP or something

2016-10-18 02:52:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Just at a guess:

Take a countably dense subset of S. Look at the set of all rational number scalar multiples of members of S. That would be a countably dense subset of the whole space, no?

Conversely, take a countably dense subset of the X. Normalize each of its elements. Wouldn't the result be a countably dense subset of S?

2007-03-11 12:46:45 · answer #4 · answered by Curt Monash 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers