What do you think?
2007-03-11 05:48:07 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
no, no dna evidence, she lied
2007-03-11 05:50:41 · answer #1 · answered by Departed 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Of course they didn't. They were on trial because they were white. Had it been a white s-l-u-t who claimed she was raped by 4 ******* bucks; it would have been her on trial.
The DA should be disbarred and banned from teaching law. The fired/forced to resign coach should sue Duke for millions and the Duke boys should sue the DA, the State of NC, the who-re, and Duke.
2007-03-11 17:12:54 · answer #2 · answered by Boom Boom 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well now that it is proven she did infact have seman of 7 men in her vaginal area and her panties. That constitutes a rape. No human has sex with that many people without being raped. She is just a hard working mother working 4 jobs and going to college soon. I repeat to think that she sexed that many men willingly is to call her an animal. And wes no that aint not the case. It is just the white man buying his way out of trouble. Everyone no they did it. She is a victom of white society tryin to keep the great black man down.
2007-03-11 13:48:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No they didn't, but what happened to those black football players accused of raping an 11 year-old white girl?
That story didn't get any media attention. I wonder why?
2007-03-11 19:39:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, the vindictive creature was mad at them because they didn't want to see her nekkid, so she screamed rape. Too bad so many liberal morons gave her the benefit of the doubt, especially considering the source.
2007-03-13 14:02:15 · answer #5 · answered by REV. JESSE LEE PETERSON 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Most rapes are based on DNA-You gotta shoot it out to rape somebody apparently (maybe Caucasian guys can rape you with out shootin'(semen) out- I dunno,? But as far as evidence goes they can't be convicted as far as semen goes,and most rape convictions goes on the presence of semen from which DNA can be extracted and proof shown someone was there.DNA is in saliva,mouth cheek cells,blood,hair,flesh,also.You can get an DNA test without mailing in SEMEN you know.
2007-03-11 13:18:43 · answer #6 · answered by Wonder-full 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
DNA evidence says different, so they must be innocent. Plus her story is starting to change a little too much for me to believe her.
2007-03-11 16:37:37 · answer #7 · answered by Knowledge 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
She was selling her A** for the almighty dollar. Got her little feelings hurt somewhere along the way and decided to use her minimal brain power to go for some big money.
2007-03-11 14:14:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I heard that the DNA evidence cleared the guys of any guilt.
2007-03-11 13:11:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
There hasn't been any evidence presented to indicate anything happened.
2007-03-11 12:58:04 · answer #10 · answered by djm749 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont have to think about this...the answer is no and there is proof positive for this. they are innocent of that crime...it was the prosecutor who is guilty of a crime and he will get what is coming to him and very soon.
2007-03-11 13:00:28 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋