2007-03-11 05:22:48 · 23 answers · asked by Mortica 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://www.metimes.com/storyview.php?StoryID=20070308-035535-5672r
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/prince-harry-unrecognised-at-us-airbase/2007/03/10/1173167026800.html
http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/3988625a4560.html
2007-03-11 05:26:40 · update #1
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6383747.stm
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006600104,00.html
2007-03-11 05:28:24 · update #2
Thank God for the American Liberals and Latinos
2007-03-11 05:29:46 · update #3
Why do American Republicans continue to misinform the Globe of their participation in Iraq that is non-existant? BBC reports say involvement is at a all time low at 15%. I would listen to Fox news if I was being held down and burned with a cattle prod.
2007-03-11 05:38:29 · update #4
Spamming my question doesn't make the Republicans participation any more clear to the real World out side of Fox news.
2007-03-11 05:42:17 · update #5
Your Prince Harry is a patriot who believes in defending his country. Some people in the US who are Republicans have put their lives or the lives of their loved ones on the line. But most high ranking Republicans have not. Not one of Bush's extended family is serving. They say it is because it is an all volunteer army and so they don't have to. That is technically so, but Robert Lincoln, Archie Roosevelt, Theodore Roosevelt Jr, and Eisenhower's son, all sons of Republican presidents, DID volunteer and DID serve their nation in time of war.
IMHO, if a person believes in the war, they put their lives on the line for it. Those who say they are for the war but don't are chickenhawks or worse.
2007-03-11 05:40:44 · answer #1 · answered by KCBA 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
First of all to be king you must join the military, 2nd names any Dem's that are running that served and don't bash the military. This is the #1 reason a lot of people are against the Democrats. They speak against the war (I voted for it until I voted against it) and trying to spend less on the military when it needs more then ever. which is still not close to what we were dishing out in WWII. If they would stop spending on illegals, the Canada universal health plan for the U.S., and SSI then they could say " listing to the people" but we now they won't because the Left of the Dem's is against the voice of the people. By the way thousands of Republicans serve in the military that's why all most vet's hate Sen. Kerry.
2007-03-11 05:44:38 · answer #2 · answered by AFIN 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Fanciful mind's eye you've. Harry will come living house even as all is asserted and accomplished. If he's a humiliation because of his seems.... properly, he has regarded that way for years, hasn't he? How does no longer coming living house replace that? i imagine it truly is more suitable his behaviour it truly is embarrassing. will be reliable even as he's matured somewhat and settled down a touch.
2016-12-01 20:13:50 · answer #3 · answered by philipp 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your statement is an untruth. Duncan Hunter who is a current US Senator of California and Presidential candidate for 08 has a son that was deployed to Iraq. He is Republican. Most of our troops are Republican.
Your statement is absurd in that Liberals don't believe in war and militarization so I fail to see how you believe they are the ones fighting. The Republicans were the ones who called for the invasion and the Republicans are the ones fighting. Seems you didn't really think that one through, huh?
Edit: If you feel that you have credible sources showing a low level of Republican participation in the Iraq war, please include them. So far all the sources you have listed are just articles about Harry. I don't believe that anyone is debating Harry is in Iraq. It's the rest of your claims that don't have any factual basis. In fact I will provide a source which proves you wrong and that 57% of the troops are Republican as opposed to 13% Democrat:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5964655/
2007-03-11 05:27:30 · answer #4 · answered by Nationalist 4 · 9⤊ 4⤋
Who do you think joins the military? The majority are Republicans. The majority of the military vote Republican.
Did the Brits decide to cut and run when Harry was going to Iraq?
Either way, I laud his service.
Will you only be happy if Bushes daughters join? Should he force his daughters to join a volunteer military?
2007-03-11 05:39:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Prince Harry is going by his choice. They tried to tell him that he wouldn't be going with his fellow comrades but he told them that he couldn't not go. It's a sense of duty. When you work side by side with your squad and company they become family. So it's because of his "brotherhood" with his fellow soldiers that makes him want to be there with them.
2007-03-11 05:29:33 · answer #6 · answered by LYL 1 · 8⤊ 0⤋
He'd joined the military most Republicans don't want to join the military because they don't want to go to Iraq. However, if Harry will be in Southern Iraq which is much safer than where US troops are fighting. Harry wouldn't be going to Iraq if he had to fight where American troops are fighting like the Sunni Triangle, Baghdad, & Anwar province (much more dangerous than where Harry will be.)
2007-03-11 05:36:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Where on earth did you get information even remotely indicating that most of the enlisted men are NOT Republicans? The opposite it true, the majority are NOT liberal sissy-boys.
2007-03-11 05:52:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
They also said he will be kept out of all military situations that are deemed "dangerous" Nothing quite like sippin' tea 1000 miles from the battle.
2007-03-11 05:29:33 · answer #9 · answered by InTheWright 3 · 5⤊ 2⤋
We wouldn't even have a military if it weren't for the Republicans and independents in it. Less than 20% are liberals.
2007-03-11 05:34:20 · answer #10 · answered by archangel72901 4 · 5⤊ 3⤋