English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-11 04:26:15 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

20 answers

You tell me if you know...why is W. unfit to be president...oh, wait...we already have the proof and reasons.

2007-03-11 04:30:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 6

With nothing more than four years as a New York Senator and being married to Bill Clinton as a first lady..........she has no experience and is the most unfit candidate for the presidency I have EVER seen. Nothing to fall back on. No experience or knowledge of the military at all. (Someone will have to teach her how to salute properly.) This bothers me greatly during a war time situation knowing that our president is the last link in the military chain of command. ScArY.

2007-03-11 11:49:43 · answer #2 · answered by bankster 3 · 0 0

I don't think she is 'unfit' per se.
One surely must question whether she would be ANYONES choice for president is she weren't married to Bill.
But that didn't stop her being elected senator.
Her campaigning skills are, frankly, dismal. She exhibits none of the charm, warmth or humor of her husband, and has real difficulty connecting to an audience.
Her other HUGE problem is that she really does come off as someone without a true moral compass - whatever the polls say - that's her position du jour.
basicly her problem is - very like Mr Gore in 2000 - she is uncomfortable in her own skin...Hillary is so afraid we will find out who she really is, that she becomes confused trying to give us what her handlers THINK we want.
Mrs Clinton is a VERY liberal person...fine. Be honest about it and maybe some independants will come around to you.
Unfortunately, she is dishonest about her true leanings and that leaves her wide open to critism from BOTH sides.

2007-03-11 11:36:07 · answer #3 · answered by Garrett S 3 · 1 0

I don't know if she is unfit, but I don't want her to be my president. It' not exactly because she is a woman; it's because her policies are mainly cut and run, and hide, plus the fact that no one really knows what her true stance is on Iraw, as she keeps flip flopping. Plus the fact that terrorists hate women and are not afraid of women at all. The terrorists are afraid of Bush, I know it. They have not attacked us since 9/11, because of our strict policies and they are afraid that our military could strike anywhere because Bush is not afraid to attack anywhere. Not many people are ready for either a Black President or a woman President. If we got either, not many people would support the President, and we could have a President, like Bush, who not many people like.

2007-03-11 12:00:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

1.) I hate her flip-flopping on Iraq. She has no strength in her convictions. She's not presidential material right there.

2.) I don't like how she fiercely defended her husband when the scandal broke about his affairs. She was delusional about it all - calling it a "vast right wing conspiracy" against her husband.

3.) She didn't divorce Bill after it all came out and he admitted to having a sexual relationship with Monica. I think a woman with any sort of backbone or self-esteem would have dumped him. But she stayed married because she has ulterior motives - afterall, she's a femme-nazi whose mission in life is to become the first female president.

2007-03-11 11:51:46 · answer #5 · answered by Jenny A_331 3 · 0 0

Hillary doesn't have any ideas or plans of her own.

She wakes up in the morning and looks at the polls on different issues on CNN and then she uses those as her Pulpit for the day.

She flops on issues more times than a guppy that just jumped out of the fish tank onto the table.

2007-03-11 11:36:04 · answer #6 · answered by Duh 3 · 1 0

Because she is too wishy-washy on alot of issues. The war for instance, in 02 she supported it. When things were going seemingly well. (Takeover of Baghdad, capture of Saddam etc) she stated that she was glad that she voted to go to war. Also, before we actually went in, she stated that the intel was correct and that she had done her own investigation with ppl she trusted. Said also that some of the intel matched that collected during Bill Clinton administration.

Fast forward to today and she says she is totally against it, following opinion polls and party lines.

2007-03-11 11:36:29 · answer #7 · answered by Johnny Conservative 5 · 1 0

I don't respect her for all the scandels she has supported Bill Clinton through, some before his presidency, and in her law firm. I'm not sure what the whitewater and other things were, but she knows her husband has had multiple affairs, and it hasn't mattered as long as he can aid her in gaining her political goals, and I'm uncomfortable with that, and would hate to hold her as role model for a daughter. She may be as good as many men who have served, I'm waiting to see my options.

2007-03-11 11:35:57 · answer #8 · answered by Linda L 3 · 2 1

Just look at what she tried to do with her health care plan. A total Government take over!
You would have broken the law by going to your own Doctor instead of the government appointed one.
She thinks she knows whats best for everyone and is gonna tell everyone what they can and can't do.
Foolish nanny is the most polite thing I can think of to say about her.
Communist dictator wanna be is more like it.

2007-03-11 11:35:07 · answer #9 · answered by Delphi 4 · 1 1

Because she is a far, far, left wing liberal. Very scary and very dangerous particularly since she would have the equally dangerous Nancy in the House and the Senate with idiot Ted and cohorts.

2007-03-12 15:10:38 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

She already was co-president for 8 years and failed miserably. Does anyone remember the slogan "vote for Bill Clinton, you get two for the price of one "?

2007-03-11 11:32:59 · answer #11 · answered by Bawney 6 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers