Clinton for fooling around w/ Monica & lying about it.
or
Newt fooling around w/ his assistant who was half his age & then asking his wife for a divorce while she lay in a hospital bed dying of cancer, so he could marry his assistant.
2007-03-11 03:41:40 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Newt for criticizing Clinton while at the same time "fooling around w/ his assistant who was half his age & then asking his wife for a divorce while she lay in a hospital bed dying of cancer, so he could marry his assistant."
2007-03-11 04:08:42 · answer #1 · answered by eric c 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
so a techniques as i'm in touch, Mr. Gingrich, is purely as his first call implies, a slimy Newt. No, he's not extra morally upstanding than Clinton. Clinton finally admitted to his wrongdoing, Gingrich in no way did. Newt has been divorced a number of circumstances, Clinton has made up together with his spouse, and did no longer get divorced. I agree that the bomb he dropped on his spouse at the same time as she grew to become into interior the wellness center with maximum cancers is thoroughly heartless, to a pair it shows some kind of 'inner power,' perverted because it could seem. yet you will possibly be able to desire to cajole human beings like bill O'Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, and Sean Hannity of this, because of the fact they have the biggest mouths, and talk the main, while it is composed of conservative propaganda.
2016-10-18 02:40:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bill Clinton, of course. Bill was President of the United States when he had a sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky. He then lied about it under oath committing perjury and obstruction of justice. Clinton has always been a dirtbag. He's been accused of everything from sexual harassment (Paula Jones) to rape (Juanita Broaddrick). The man is a perv. I think he's a sex addict.
2007-03-11 04:28:45 · answer #3 · answered by Jenny A_331 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Better question might be - which man accomplished more during his career? I don't know; I'm just asking the question.
You know, as much as Republicans defend the actions of Big Business - global outsourcing, off-shore accounts, high CEO salaries, etc. - you would think that they would apply the same "laissez-faire" philosophy to all politicians, regardless of party affiliation.
I guarantee you, if a CEO is growing a business and making the stockholders happy with dividends, they couldn't care LESS if the guy was receiving daily scheduled BJs in his office, as long as the cash keeps flowing.........
2007-03-11 04:43:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Newt Gingrich
asking his dying wife for a divorce so he could marry his assistant is horrible
2007-03-11 05:03:54 · answer #5 · answered by Erica H 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The way I understand it, Clinton also sexually assaulted a few other women as governor and had his state police bodyguards cover it up. Anybody with knowledge of his personal life back then is dead, except for Hillary. Newt was a jerk for doing what he did but it was not criminal.
2007-03-11 03:48:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Was Newt doing it in the White House with an intern? Did he lie under oath? Well,he fessed up and Bill never will. So,I'd say Bill.
2007-03-11 03:44:38 · answer #7 · answered by Got a light Leo? 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
That's a tough one. I don't think either of them are pinnacles of moral character. My impression is that, with respect to public service, Bill Clinton had the best interests of more people in mind than did Newt. But, that's just speculation.
2007-03-11 03:46:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
gotta go with Bill as the winner in this contest. He is the Biggest Dirt Bag.
2007-03-11 03:47:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Clinton. Newt has never been accused of rape, as Clinton has.
2007-03-11 03:44:39 · answer #10 · answered by Mycroft 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋