English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I seriously propose this question to everyone to answer truthfully. Thank You.

2007-03-11 03:37:12 · 5 answers · asked by . 2 in Social Science Psychology

5 answers

Yes, I think it is very immature.

2007-03-11 03:40:42 · answer #1 · answered by Guess Who 6 · 0 0

That really depends on who and what he's being condemned for. The phrase "picking on someone your own size" is fairly explanatory when condemnation entails immaturity. For example, when the world laughed at Micheal Jackson for his nose and then subsequently at him for becoming a virtual "nobody", that was immature. But when the world disagreed with Saddam Hussein and pushed for him to be punished, that was not an immature action.
Therefore, you can only base the justification of whether condemning someone is immature on the person and his particular action/s that invited the criticism. Serious judgement and morality often has to be called in before assessing if a condemnation is righteously wrong.
Hope that answered your question somewhat!! :-)

2007-03-11 10:52:47 · answer #2 · answered by Suguna J 2 · 0 0

immaturity is not that much defined by condemning someone (this is normal behviour for any human), but how the person deals with the condemnation. if you can see that you are condemning someone and you can ask yourself why you do it , what is it that you find unacceptable and how you choose to act upon that shows how mature you are.

2007-03-11 11:29:46 · answer #3 · answered by mimma 3 · 0 0

Not always: irresponsible and/or dangerous behavior needs to be addressed. That's the pinnacle of maturity.

2007-03-11 10:57:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That really depends on your reasons for condeming someone..

2007-03-11 11:09:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers