2007-03-11 01:38:11 · 47 answers · asked by kennyboy 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
that's a really good idea.
and then if the community decides it should stay, then the person who did the reporting, gets dinged 10 points.
and they can still stay anonymous.
2007-03-11 11:34:57 · answer #1 · answered by soren 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Seems like a good idea, but I doubt many people would bother to vote.
As it is when a question goes to votes, often it is won by a single vote. This could mean that if the questioner is allowed to vote, as they are when their question goes to vote, the question is unlikely to ever be marked as a violation, clearly some should.
Lovely sounding idea but needs work.
Another method is to require several abuse reports before it is considered to be an abuse, one vote shouldn't be enough to force a question or answer to be classed as a violation.
2007-03-11 01:57:33 · answer #2 · answered by FairyBlessed 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think of that's a greater effective plan than what's achieved now. i've got asked Yahoo to furnish the justifications for 2 violations i've got gained and function by no skill gotten something greater effective than a sort letter reaction. it may well be effective to renowned what i've got supposedly achieved incorrect, so as that i'm able to circumvent repeating the errors interior the destiny.
2016-10-01 22:39:12 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes what a good idea, after all we are the people who answer.
Some of the questions seem quite innocent, and yet others that may offend stay. It doesn't make sense. I also resent one of my friends being removed off my list, without being told by Yahoo.
I get fond of the crowd I am in contact with.
And yes, I've written to complain several times.
Good idea Kenny, you talk a lot of sense.
Do you know, I'm not suppose to say that to you on here. Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgh!
Kisses, Cassandra XXXXXx
2007-03-11 03:55:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes and ansers as well it would make it a faire system (can we get a point for voting as well) but the identoty of the questionaire or ansere or should be sectet (so there is no voting for them becouse you dont like them but if the violation was in the pictuer then just the pictuer should be shown)
2007-03-11 01:43:38 · answer #5 · answered by Michael D 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brilliant idea...I so would like to know why I got about 10 violations since I'm here.
2007-03-11 03:20:35 · answer #6 · answered by Einstein 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is such a good idea, especially as Yahoo don't even investigate reports of abuse and just issue violations automatically, I think it would make things much fairer.
2007-03-11 01:51:07 · answer #7 · answered by Kirsty 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats actually a very good idea Kenny, if I were you I'd put it to yahoo. It's about time something was sorted out with the ones that are just reporting us for spite!
2007-03-11 03:11:40 · answer #8 · answered by Kizzy_ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes they should, Would stop people arsing around and violating worthy q's
2007-03-11 03:00:56 · answer #9 · answered by vwsal22 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In theory it sounds like a great idea. But we would be so busy voting on whether they should be removed we wouldn't have time to ask or answer any others...lol
2007-03-11 05:02:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Violated bit of a strange word in this context.
2007-03-11 01:45:58 · answer #11 · answered by neologycycles 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋