English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The answer should be based on Charles Darwin's theory.

2007-03-11 00:28:07 · 4 answers · asked by tuugud 1 in Science & Mathematics Biology

4 answers

Darwin makes no specific mention of weeds.
Weeds are just plants, like any other.

They have found their own stragety for survival.

Some plants are content to grow slowly, but are very sturdy (like trees).
Others make sure they survive long enough by not getting eaten (poisonous or prickly plants).
Weeds have a different strategy: spring up fast, and multiply fast - so some of you survive long enough to have offspring.
It works for them, it allows them to fill vacant nices that would cost other plants more time.

2007-03-11 00:39:20 · answer #1 · answered by mgerben 5 · 2 0

Weeds are plants and what Darwin says about plants is too extensive to post here. They have no particular significance within the field of evolutionary biology.

2007-03-11 09:05:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You are asking the wrong question. The term weeds is a term we use to describe plants that we do not want around. They are a nuisance to us. As an example dandelion on a lawn is considered a weed. But, you possibly do not realise that dandelion leaves can be harvested and cooked as a leafy green. They are quite delicious if harvested before the plant flowers.

2007-03-11 08:37:30 · answer #3 · answered by sparbles 5 · 2 0

Darwin's theory doesnt seem satisfactory 2 me atleast,,he has done many mistakes which i come 2 know after visiting the following site,,,,,www.harunyahya.com

2007-03-11 08:45:11 · answer #4 · answered by hadi 1 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers