you might as well ask "How do I stop the wind from blowing?" or "How do I get a fish to walk on his back fins."
Something like voting is done by personal opinion. each person has a different perspective on what would be right for every one else, and no one can agree on what that really is.
Wisdom is still based on personal perspective, you cant force people to see the world as you would like any more than they can force you to view the world as the would like.
The best thing we can hope for is finding a common ground and working from there, but even that is asking allot.
2007-03-11 00:25:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Stone K 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
First, I don't think we can guarantee that we are voting wisely. Sure, we think we're making the right decisions for the right reasons, but let's be honest. We all made some lousy choices, and we've all been fooled. Maybe not in politics, at least not yet, but somewhere. Haven't we all been friends with a jerk, or bought a really bad car, or tried a really ineffective diet, or something?
Second, let's assume we do make the right choice. There's still no guarantee that our candidates will be successful when facing the challenges of the office. A great mayoral candidate may still have a nervous breakdown, a governor may still yield to temptation when confronted with temptations while in office.
Third, even if the best candidate becomes the best office holder, unless the will of the people support him, then it won't matter. If the public isn't behind him, then others can take advantage, and exploit his unpopularity their own agendas.
So, just vote the best you can, and be a pain in the neck for the evil-doers. And hope for the best.
2007-03-11 00:55:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mr. Bad Day 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Who gets to make the determination of who is voting wisely? In the optimum democracy all people would take the time to become informed and voted accordingly. We do not live in an optimum democracy. Instead what we have is 30 second soundbyte culture where people are easily swayed by rhetoric. The majority of people don't vote at all in this country and this just not going to change anytime soon. The best you can do is talk to people honestly about your beliefs. If you influence 1 in 10 using this tactic I would say you are ahead of the curve.
2007-03-11 00:32:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bryan 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
To voice my opinion, the vote casting technique of the elections is already dealt with. i think that they meaning the congress already have a kind on who is going to win yet to make it greater exciting they make it an opened contest. It rather would not count who you vote for. No, wait i don't likely choose to have self assurance that, yet I purely would desire to ask your self, the place do the applicants come from. I recommend who recognize approximately Obama until now he became right into a presidential candidate beside the state that he's from. to respond to the question, the media has the 1st hand impression over the universal public. Why? because of the fact they are in a position to bypass the place we can not we can not holiday around the international following the process the applicants. The media does it for the human beings who would pick an basic look at what is going on or perhaps the guy who ensue to get a glimpses of the information. the fee would be that we purely get what they choose us to work out. in line with possibility something that the media has to show us. So, no they don't have a individual interest in techniques yet there very own and the help of there sponsors. i'm uncertain how the applicants are picked and in case you do then please enable me recognize, yet for those people who do not. How ought to we study something we don't no.? it may be wonderful to think of so, suited. Spending money properly it particularly is, isn't something a super kind of human beings do. So why would desire to the presidential applicants do?
2016-12-18 10:41:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The problem is that even if we could get the majority of the voters to be informed on the issues, not everyone will agree about which position is 'wise'. What you consider voting wisely is not what someone else considers voting wisely. If we all agreed on what a 'wise' vote was, there would be no need to vote at all.
2007-03-11 09:45:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by STEVEN F 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think "vote wisely" in this question means to vote for the person they feel will do a better job, and just vote for "Your Party".
I think people are getting fed up with politics all together... The voting turn-outs prove that.
Good luck in your venture
2007-03-11 00:24:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mike E 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Why do I get the idea that when you say 'vote wisely' you really meant to vote the same way YOU do ?
But to answer your question, distribute literature both for and against what the vote is for and let others make up their own mind.
2007-03-11 00:17:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Let a really terrible politician become elected and shock the people into carrying. We only notice when things go poorly. My toliet was clogged once, I flushed several times, until it nearly reach the brim. I flushed it one more time for good measure. And then I was stepping in my own crap water. I will never do that again, just I will never be undereducated in regards to a candidate.
2007-03-11 00:17:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Heero Yui 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Treat other peoples views with respect. Find common ground and work from there. Then find the goals they expect and attempt to influence them as to how there goal can be achieved by the candidate your supporting.
2007-03-11 03:02:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anyone who thinks they can affect real change via the democratic process of elections is fooling themselves. There is no difference between party a and party b. They both advance the corporate globalist cause that will eventually enslave all people.
2007-03-11 00:15:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Cybeq 5
·
0⤊
1⤋