It is now a fact that Israel hase so many atomic bombs.president Bosh has no objection about that. but his excellency has many objections for Iran to go further in Neuclleur research. Is the safty of Americans means everything (that is also very important to me) while safty of others means nothing
2007-03-10 22:48:07 · 11 answers · asked by essamhasby 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Israel is not a terrorist nation. They have the right to defend them self, and I think that the US is right by backing them. You ain't seen nothing yet.
2007-03-10 22:53:15 · answer #1 · answered by Ex Head 6 · 5⤊ 4⤋
Strictly hypothetically if Iran did nuke Israel there would not be a Iran to talk approximately day after on the instant i assure you . Obama could desire to no longer save them even regardless of the indisputable fact that i think of he might attempt ..I viewed the best minister if Israel on television state in numerous words the international community meaning the united international locations greater effective muzzle Iran in the different case they might concentration on it and that they weren't approximately to take a seat decrease back and enable it ensue .. now that's what's approximately to ensue interior the genuine international and while it does all hell could injury out i do no longer recognize for useful and that i'm no longer a fortune teller ...however the prospect for a international war exists wide-unfold the sunlight comes up
2016-10-01 22:33:49 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually I don't agree with Israel having nukes,nor with Iran having nukes....As far as I am concerned no country in this world should have those weapons...
As for why Israel can have them and Iran no,it's called double standard...Israel agrees with US policies,while Iran no...And we all remember what Bush said "You're with us or against us".There is no middle way as far as Bush is concerned...
Everyone is asking Iran to give up something they have every right to...They signed the NNPT,so they are not doing anything illegal by making nuclear energy...Israel didn't sign the NNPT so no one can verify if they have nuclear weapons or not.But Olmert admitted last year that Israel has nukes,by saying that "Iranians were aspiring to have nuclear weapons as America, France, ISRAEL, Russia"...International community's reaction?"Olmert was misunderstood"...But I guess this is what it happens when you have the support of the strongest country in the world...
Iran never attacked any country,Israel attacked all the countries surrounding it...Also Israel used uranium bombs last summer in Lebanon,and yet Iran is a great danger...
2007-03-10 23:35:31 · answer #3 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't think Iran should have nukes but I also don't agree with Israel having them. The only reason they are allowed is because the US is their big brother whereas they consider Iran a "terrorist" state simply because Iran doesn't like the US.
2007-03-10 23:00:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think I understand your question:
Israel and Iran are probably both as dangerous as each other in geo-political terms and neither actually require nuclear arms.
A nuclear arms race in the middle east is a horrible concept and is one of the most likely causes for a nuclear exchange between nation states (forget N Korea and China)
Israel, however, have superb security forces and intellgence services. They wouldnt likely lose control of a nuclear weapon. The same CANNOT be said of Iran who are an unstable country and could lose a nuclear weapon to terrorists or arms traders.
THe other alarming possiblity is Iran handing a nuclear weapon to a terrorist organisation to set off in a briefcase bomb somwhere (likely Israel but perhaps the US or England)
2007-03-10 22:54:42 · answer #5 · answered by spiro_sea 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
This is easy.
We don't mind Israel having nukes because there is virtually no chance of Israeli nukes raining down on American cities. Or British Cities. Or French Cities.
Iran? Seeing as they continually refer to us as "the Great Satan"...we are considerably more nervous. Doubly so for the Israelis considering Iran's President and their material and monetary support for Hezbollah. So, no, no nukes for Iran.
2007-03-10 23:22:18 · answer #6 · answered by jw 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Israel hasn't hurt any one. Iran has been linked with terrorist organizations.
2007-03-12 06:52:51 · answer #7 · answered by 14 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Iran has declared that it intends to wipe Israel off the map.
Israel intends to use any weapons it may or may not have as a deterrent.
The difference is clear.
2007-03-10 22:56:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Probably because Israel has not threatened to wipe any other nation off the map with a bomb, whereas Iran has.
2007-03-10 22:53:56 · answer #9 · answered by TE 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
I don't agree with it..Iran should have nuclear weapons too.
2007-03-10 22:52:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋