After science claims of how Piltdown man was the "missing link" turned out to be false and the fact that Pluto was deemed a planet before and now it isn't, do you really trust these books?
2007-03-10 22:25:05 · 11 answers · asked by Sandstorm222 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
partially
2007-03-10 22:28:23 · answer #1 · answered by booge 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i'm no longer a 'hitter.' Frankly, i'm able to tolerate a 'swat' if a baby reaches for something on a warm range; or reaches right into a fan. whether...i'm worried that numerous questions approximately Y/A are from S&M-form persons who 'get off' on bare-backside spankings of their babies. that may not sturdy! Get your better half to consent to a 'bare backside spanking.' in the experience that your better half enjoys it; and you 'get off' on it; then anybody is happy! and you do no longer could contain a small baby on your "exhilaration!" The small baby will savor this, to boot!
2016-09-30 12:35:06 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Science is the truth of life...
Sometimes the assumptions and experimentations go wrong..
We should not get overly disappointed with that...
Yes i do trust science books...
2007-03-10 22:30:28 · answer #3 · answered by Harsh Peeush 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Only some things.
2007-03-10 22:29:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, they confuse me.
Will you help me understand?
I'm studying the human body.....
2007-03-11 05:49:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2007-03-10 22:34:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes. we're always finding new info.
2007-03-10 22:30:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No
2007-03-10 22:28:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
nope.
2007-03-10 22:27:56 · answer #9 · answered by RANDELL 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no i do not
2007-03-10 22:28:06 · answer #10 · answered by Mississippi's Jersey girl 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋