It seems she only wants to believe in what she wants to believe. Has she ever travelled out of the borders of the USA before? it appears not or at least read up on other countries and other faiths.
2007-03-10 20:08:20 · 10 answers · asked by Armchair Warrior 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Coulter is a wildebeest in drag. Let the Yak yap.
Her faith is in blindness - it is the blessing of all who meet her. It is surpassed only by the blessed deaf, who have the great good fortune not to hear her whine like the concubine of Satan that she is.
She also smells like New Jersey.
2007-03-10 22:00:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's amazing how the libs will scream for freedom of speech for anyone or anything except when a conservative makes a comment. If you are a pedophile, a rapist, an atheist, or any manner of differnece in opinion.. as longas you hate bush you can join the club and rant away being able to say "freedon of speech" , but if you are on the right side you get attacked right off the bat. It doesn't matter if i like or dislike what she said, it's her right to say what she will, I am sick and tired of all this PC b*****it. the nation is becoming a bunch of wussies....
2007-03-11 06:06:15 · answer #2 · answered by lethander_99 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Maybe she has, maybe that is why she feels she can say what she says. Or maybe she just has a big mouth. Up to each person to decide. I don't think her biggest concern is being politcally correct. She likes to stir the pot, get people agitated, and it looks like she has.
How is she different from most people anyway? Your statement that 'she only wants to believe in what she wants to believe' can apply to pretty much everybody else.
2007-03-11 05:36:44 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't know why people make such a big deal about her non-comment . And the term she said she'd like to use. . . is also a term that means 'coward or weakling' . Ask anybody who grew-up in the 70's and 80's . When we used that term back then, it did not always mean 'gay' .
2007-03-11 05:19:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Shes just another shock jock (books instead of radio). Her opinion is as valuable as howard sterns.
2007-03-11 05:20:46 · answer #5 · answered by Nicholas J 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's a free country.
Ann has every right to say and do as she pleases
2007-03-11 05:41:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
well, she clearly knows nothing about canada, although she is convinced she is the expert.
laughable stupidity
if she is as clueless about canada it stands to reason she'd know less about more distant countries.
she needs that condescending smirk slapped off that heinous face
2007-03-11 05:37:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, I assume so. She doesn't care
You see, just like the left the right is repleat with whack jobs. They all need to go away!!
2007-03-11 05:11:55 · answer #8 · answered by Nehru 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Anything is possible
2007-03-11 05:11:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's possible she knows more about them than you do.
2007-03-11 05:10:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋