English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

Heterosexuality is a choice, plain and simple.

In nature there is no heterosexuality amongst mammals. Only sex for reproduction. Any emotional/ sexual bonding only takes place between the same-sex. Male-female sex ends at ejaculation and they don't want to look at each other's face after that. Humans are basically mammals too.

In ancient societies, and in contemporary non-heterosexual societies there are no heterosexuals, just who marry and have children becasue it is their social duty. Any society that allows male-male sex as masculine, e.g. the ancient Greeks or the present day (parts of) Afghans, men always prefer same-sex bonds over that with the opposite sex.

Had heterosexuality been normal and natural, you will not need so many mechanisms (including extreme pressures and rewards) to people who choose heterosexuality. I mean will the society reward someone for eating food? Why because people want to eat food themselves.

Also, manhood in our societies is granted when a man proves he can do it with women. If you look at the history of manhood, it has always been granted when men do something that they really hate......... and that really hurts and bothers them (like being stung by a thousand bees and not making a sigh). It tells a volume about the fact that if left on their own men will avoid both relationships with women and sex with them. Sex with females will happen only for reproduction and a man typically will have it twice or thrice in his life.

So the crux of the matter is that most men today choose to be heterosexual....... they wear heterosexual masks so that they can get social manhood (in the heterosexual world which means a 'straight' status).

What is the use of wearing masks if you can't flaunt them?

Men exaggerate and make a show of their heterosexuality because they have worked hard upon themselves to be seen as a heterosexual. They usually have made great sacrifices (including that of their abilitty to bond sexually with another man). They flaunt it because it has an immense social value. It gives them enormous and much needed points of manhood, which they need for survival in the intense race for manhood.

2007-03-11 03:17:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yeah, they flaunt it. Always trying to convert everyone to being breeders. Men and women kissing, public displays of affection, straight sex in just about every movie, you can't look around without seeing a man and a woman all hopped up on each other, etc. etc. etc.

It's okay, they'll get what's coming to them. They're all gonna burn in hell for all eternity because they are sick, disgusting and immoral. Abominations, all of them.

Now come on heteros, how would you feel if you actually had a vast majority of all people telling you that sh*t every single day of your lives? How would it feel?

2007-03-10 20:47:36 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 2 0

heterosexuals have purely as lots wild intercourse as homosexuals. we've an identical insecure behavior and crave lots of an identical issues. i in my opinion as a immediately lady see little distinction in maximum hetero/homo relationships. In the two circumstances, couplings might exist basically for actual motives, emotional desires, or the two. by making use of the way, (to a minimum of one among the different solutions) i do no longer relish being referred to as a breeder purely because of the fact i'm immediately. there are various homosexuals who've infants before and AFTER popping out.

2016-10-18 02:21:52 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Heterosexuals, like christians, believe their way is the only right way and flaunt their lifestyle - convinced everyone envies and wants to be like them...

2007-03-11 00:18:31 · answer #4 · answered by Clarkie 6 · 1 0

Ha! I love it!

My mom and I were once eating in a mall food court. Passing by were a male homo couple. She immediately squinted, huffed and said she'd had enough of them throwing it in her face. They'd just walked by her! Just 2 normal people. Look the other way and there were hetero couples doing the same, but no mention made there.

2007-03-10 19:37:04 · answer #5 · answered by girlsincamelot 2 · 4 0

I have to be honest its not always like that, not too long ago in england it was illegal to show affection for one another in public, and in india women are dressed up in sheets so the men wont be atrracted to them. your right i tend to turn my head when i see a straight couple holding hands but funny i sometimes do the same when i see a gay couple.

2007-03-10 20:15:39 · answer #6 · answered by cutelagayguy 4 · 1 0

First: Sorry, Older, I hit the wrong button. It was supposed to be a "thumbs up". I'm sorry about that.

Anyways... Yea! What gives?! Dang heteros and all their PDA... it's EVERYWHERE these days. We should really put a stop to it. The kids could be watching, y'know?

2007-03-10 20:14:11 · answer #7 · answered by Danielle 2 · 2 0

Nice one - however, I have yet to see a "Het Pride" parade, and I DREAD TO THINK WHAT THE REACTION WOULD BE TO SOMEBODY ADVERTISING A CLUB AS BEING "FOR HETEROSEXUALS". (Sorry, I hit cap lock and can't be bothered to go back)

2007-03-10 19:19:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

I agree. Next they'll be asking for insurance for their spouce's and the legal right to get married. They should all be put on a island far away from the rest of us.

2007-03-10 20:00:49 · answer #9 · answered by older, not wiser 3 · 2 2

Yeah dude, they flaunt it sooooooo much don't they? With their "Straight Pride Parade", "Straight Bars", all "straight websites", c'mon dude r u f*cking kidding me. I get it you're a flamer, the kind of queen I would never date.

2007-03-10 20:13:59 · answer #10 · answered by Felix 1 · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers