English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

On my show last year (The THINKfuture Radio Show Podcast), I predicted this. Do you think I'm right? Sometimes it feels like theres some kind of collusion going on between the parties - since Bush seems to be running the Republicans into the ground. Do you think this is all been planned ahead of time - that its now "Hillary's Turn" and by the same token, the "Democrats Turn"

2007-03-10 18:53:06 · 13 answers · asked by Chris Future 3 in Politics & Government Elections

13 answers

I don't see how Hillary can win the Presidential election as a third party candiate.

Every new poll shows that Obama is over taking Hillary, and obama will probaly end up with the nomination.

Hillarys war vote is killing her.

I think if Rudy Giuliani can actually get the Republican nomination( its not gonna be easy)

That Rudy will win the 2008 presidential election.

He has more crossover appeal than either of the Democrat candiates.

2007-03-10 19:22:11 · answer #1 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 1 1

Bush is not running the Republican party into the ground. It is only your flawed opinion. There are three good Republicans trying to run for president who would give the Democrats a run for their money. Hillary doesn't have a prayer in 2008 or beyond that. She is a two-faced woman who wouldn't know what to do as president. She would be as disaster. Obama would be better but even he can't measure up to any of the Repubs who are currently running. The Dems are totally mixed up in their beliefs and not a single one of them has a clear cut direction for their party for 2008/ They won't make it even if Clinton ran again.

2007-03-10 23:54:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I've no doubt that Hillary will be the next President. I'm working on her campaign, so I might be a bit prejudiced lol. I do think you are right, all joking aside. There's a "destiny" feel about it that keeps lingering and growing stronger. If she does well in the debates everyone else is toast (my own little prediction). I don't really think there's a real collusion though, that's a little too Machiavellian for me to swallow. But, ahem, I seem to have no trouble swallowing that Destiny (that huge yet invisible cloud that hangs over all of our heads) says it shall be so.

2007-03-10 19:01:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I've seen a lot of sure winners not even get nominated. There is still a long time to go. BTW, Hillary doesn't do very well against several Republicans in the polls.

2007-03-10 19:21:54 · answer #4 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1 0

interior the constraints you impose, this question won't have the ability to be replied. you place the question as much as get the solutions you pick to hearken to, not the reality! Your questions and my replies: rather, i'm finding for a million) a vote casting checklist that shows consistency in what she helps. i don't stick to her vote casting checklist, i'm from Calooneyfornia. 2) evedence of positive ethical character you're kidding, suited? degree to which she compromised national protection by using allowing categorized tips on her unsecured server is a criminal. era! All of her lies with regard to the server, Benghazi, and distinctive different fairy thoughts she spins teach her as a pathological liar. 3) historic information that her techniques are good for the economic equipment (ie. whilst Xyz raised taxes, unemployment droped by using X%) i'd quite look at her checklist in her final interest. She became into an abject failure as secretary of state. call a single country or component of the international the place our place has better over her 4 years in workplace. whilst asked this question awhile back, a state branch spokesliar necessary some days to come returned up along with her answer, then got here back with "Myanmar". heavily, Myanmar??? 4) information that she would have the ability to stand by using her convictions despite in the event that they're unpopular the reality that she had to do concentration communities until now her insincere apology for her inner maximum server says that she would have the ability to compliment the flow with the polls, not carry to her convictions. interior the destiny, her convictions would be criminal ones. 5) In what way is she greater advantageous to the different applicants of her occasion She is way less honest than any of them, so how can we have confidence something she says? replace: Please think of of this form of as ending the sentence, "i visit be vote casting for Hillary because of the fact..." i visit in no way vote for Hellary, nor the different dimocrap for that way. it particularly is one mistake I even have in no way made in my sixty seven years on the planet. What inspired you to ask this form of contrived, loaded question??? This must be between the worst questions I even have ever seen in this internet site.

2016-12-18 10:36:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It is definitely possible. She seems to get a lot of peoples attention. You never know though.
btw I read an answer you wrote in the language section about how to pronounce Greek words and all.
my ex boyfriend George is greek. I still have strong feelings for him. When we went out he asked one night if I wanted to eat dinner with his family, but later on his dad told him it's too early and kinda werid to do that right now.
If I get a 2nd chance with George I want to be able to impress his family. I am VERY interested in Greek culture and I'd like to know all I can so that they'd respect me and believe that I am very good for their son and want us to be together.
So I am going to list a question right now and after you're done reading this I would hope you'd take the time to answer it since you're greek.
thanks
Tricia

2007-03-14 17:49:54 · answer #6 · answered by dabluschmosprincess 1 · 0 0

The only thing that may stop me from voting for Hilary in 08 is her name. I'm 24, and for nearly my entire life, my country has been run by either a Bush or a Clinton.

For god's sake, give me someone from a different family for a change. I'm leaning towards Biden at the moment.

2007-03-10 19:11:30 · answer #7 · answered by Max 2 · 0 0

Good call on the collusion, at least you see behind this horsesh!t "two-party" system.

I think it'll be Obama at the last second. Hillary will screw up and say something outrageously unintelligent.

Then again, I'm voting Bugs Bunny '08, if elections will be held. Anarchism tops your silly capitalist game any day.

2007-03-10 19:00:10 · answer #8 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 0 1

I think that although it is the Dem's turn to win, the country is not ready for a female prez. If a woman did win ,it would be Hillary!

2007-03-10 19:24:48 · answer #9 · answered by nerv6963 1 · 0 1

i think obama has his foot ahead of Hillary Clinton. he gives of a vibe as if he is for both parties if you get what I'm saying.

2007-03-10 19:12:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers