Federal law makes it a crime to knowingly reveal the identity of a covert agent.
2007-03-10 18:00:26 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Change your ? marks to ! points and you may have something there.
More hearings are coming---a felony warrant is much neater than a long drag out Impeachment--ya think?
2007-03-10 18:06:08 · answer #1 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The only "up" from Libby is Cheney and Bush. Rove is sideways.
Libby's defense team was foolish trying to argue a scapegoat defense. You can't be a scapegoat unless you are charged with doing something that someone else actually did. The charges were obstruction and perjury. It's nonsensical to say "I didn't lie -- it was someone else sitting in that chair talking through me".
As far as revealing Plame's identity, that's a separate offense. And while Libby might have been the scapegoat for that, he wasn't charged with doing that.
2007-03-11 03:05:41 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Its Cheney though Politics in answers will say Bush I'd have to read proof he's guilty before I say anymore
2007-03-11 03:11:30 · answer #3 · answered by hobo 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Libby was convicted, so it pretty much stops at him. An attorney's argument doesn't matter if it doesn't work.
2007-03-11 03:05:14 · answer #4 · answered by DOOM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was one of the genitals (bush or dick), of course, out of pure malice and helpless vengeance. The republican patriotism... if Osama paid them enough, they'd sell the States to him.
2007-03-11 03:10:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think you will find out when you look in Sandy Berger's pants. You first, go ahead. C'mon.
2007-03-11 03:08:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋