English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

This question is coming from the biggest Muslim terrorist sympathizer on Y!A. The answer is no. Why would you need nuclear bombs unless you planned on going to war? They are just a waste of money unless you use them. Or are you actually implying that you think Ahmadinejad should use them?

2007-03-10 18:11:47 · answer #1 · answered by Nationalist 4 · 0 0

I agree with the first answerer.

A small country, regardless of its religion, has nothing to gain by trying to develop a nuclear bomb. And it's likely to incur a lot of risk, internal and external, by doing so.

Besides, having a nuclear weapon doesn't make you respected. Just feared. And we've seen how the US reacts when it gets scared or annoyed with someone.

2007-03-10 18:08:59 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0 0

Overall, if I was a small country I wouldn't waste the money. You may ask why and this is the reason, if you didn't have nukes by the fifty's then you are way behind the curve. Because after you make a nuke you then have to have a way to deliver it to your target area. Take Iran for example, they think that having nukes will allow them to sit at the adult table at Christmas when really all it is doing is getting itself in bigger trouble, and ultimately could cause a war, not prevent one. So no, i would take my oil money and become a tourist state, not ta terrorist one.

2007-03-11 01:50:57 · answer #3 · answered by recon1223 2 · 0 0

I don't know,what kind of a question is this!
But you must know that the threat is a threat
It doesn't matter what your faith is and that goes from Men ,Animals,and to plants.
Animals hides and run for protection and if they got caught or cornered they'll defend
Themselves and the same goes for the plants and human.
Nobody should be allowed to have any kind of deadly weapons and if we have any Justice in this world we should decide that:
NO WEAPONS to anyone is fair..or
ALLOW WEAPONS to everyone is fair.
you can't allow one country to have it
but not the other ......
Let me make it clear for everyone :
If you live in a home with your family and
There's a problem between you and the
next door neighbor and one day you found
out that he has a gun in the house,
what would you or anybody would do ?
Buy a gun to protect your family..NO ?
But the police comes to your house and is
preventing you from owning a gun !!
How can they allow the other guy to have a gun but not me ? Is it fair ? U think about it.
That's what happening in our world today ??

2007-03-10 18:54:52 · answer #4 · answered by massimo 6 · 0 0

no thats not the politically correct way respect have to be earned its easier to not have war than it is to have war whats wrong with that way? and the nuclear bomb has already been developed

2007-03-10 18:09:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Thats like Ethiopia trying to join the space race. Its a good way to waste money, unless your goal is to bluff a large superpower into helping you out by not building it.

2007-03-10 18:06:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers